Colorado LiDAR Findings

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
CheapCigarMan
Posts: 640
Joined: 12/10/2014
14ers: 58  2 
13ers: 159 2
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by CheapCigarMan »

Unranked PT 13500 is now Ranked PT 13541.

41’ gained seems like a lot. Any info on how / why this summit got 41 more feet higher?
I should be on a mountain
User avatar
Chicago Transplant
Posts: 4112
Joined: 9/7/2004
14ers: 58  12  24 
13ers: 701 46 36
Trip Reports (66)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Chicago Transplant »

CheapCigarMan wrote: Sun Oct 22, 2023 4:26 pm Unranked PT 13500 is now Ranked PT 13541.

41’ gained seems like a lot. Any info on how / why this summit got 41 more feet higher?
Are you talking about the one by Indy Pass? It already was ranked, but yes it did gain 41'. The 13,500' elevation was interpolated based on the closed contours. I suspect that had something to do with it, and the survey could have been missing a contour which messed with the interpolation.

There has been a lot of that type of stuff with this LiDAR confirmation, sometimes missing, sometimes extra contours. Including at interpolated saddles. North Maroon gained 95' of prominence despite only gaining 8' of elevation because the saddle was so far off, it must have had 2 extra contours in that saddle.
"We want the unpopular challenge. We want to test our intellect!" - Snapcase
"You are not what you own" - Fugazi
"Life's a mountain not a beach" - Fortune Cookie I got at lunch the other day
User avatar
RyanSchilling
Posts: 212
Joined: 1/18/2005
14ers: 58 
13ers: 266
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by RyanSchilling »

While hiking Black Mountain (Moffat Cty HP) last week, we noticed a helicopter taking an unusual flight pattern, sticking very close to the terrain and repeatedly criss-crossing the area. I caught a view of it, and noticed the gear protruding from the front.

Was this chopper possibly conducting LiDAR measurements?

20240814_124344.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
cloudkicker
Posts: 129
Joined: 5/21/2015
14ers: 58  10 
13ers: 234 15
Trip Reports (6)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by cloudkicker »

RyanSchilling wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2024 9:13 am While hiking Black Mountain (Moffat Cty HP) last week, we noticed a helicopter taking an unusual flight pattern, sticking very close to the terrain and repeatedly criss-crossing the area. I caught a view of it, and noticed the gear protruding from the front.

Was this chopper possibly conducting LiDAR measurements?


20240814_124344.jpg
According to the South Park bulletin Facebook group, there was some USGS survey readings going on by helicopter this week so I think that probably is in fact what you saw.
Garrett
Posts: 147
Joined: 9/17/2007
14ers: 58  3 
13ers: 787 34
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Garrett »

The USGS is currently conducting a radiometric survey collecting geologic data of the Colorado mineral belt. That’s likely what that helicopter was doing.
User avatar
RyanSchilling
Posts: 212
Joined: 1/18/2005
14ers: 58 
13ers: 266
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by RyanSchilling »

Thank you, both! Very interesting.

EDIT: Found a recent article, though it doesn't mention Moffat County, which is considered well outside of CO's mineral belt.

https://www.theflume.com/news/article_7 ... 3c830.html