Peak(s):  La Plata Peak  -  14,336 feet
Date Posted:  05/03/2009
Modified:  05/06/2014
Date Climbed:   05/01/2009
Author:  USAKeller
Additional Members:   BillMiddlebrook
 La Plata Ski Descent (North Face)- La Plata TH   

Ripping La Plata's North Face (Ski)

Date: Friday, May 1, 2009
Group: BillMiddlebrook and I
Route: Northwest Ridge standard ascent and North Face ski descent (3.25mi.) from La Plata Peak TH
Stats: 9 miles; 4,400' climbed; 3,650' skied; 12 hrs RT

Ascent route (red) and upper ski route (blue) from CO 82:

Another more direct look at the routes (red=climb; blue=ski) from the summit of Mt. Elbert taken May 11, 2008:

Topo of the route (red=climb; blue=ski):

For some arbitrary reason, I had been dreading climbing this route on La Plata in snow conditions. I was hoping that would be proved wrong today. We attempted to ski this peak June 8th of last year but an unexpected snowstorm ceased progress at 11,300ft. Thinking I was ready to give it another go, I met Bill at the trailhead late Thursday night and quickly set up camp in my car. He was there a few hours earlier, took some photos of La Plata from higher up on CO 82, and told me we would be climbing a gully just south of the standard one to achieve the ridge. He also mentioned it was 65 degrees when he arrived at the trailhead; we could only hope for the predicted 20% chance of precipitation with mostly cloudy skies the day of, and cold temperatures overnight. We started at 5:00am Friday morning, skis on the packs. The standard trail was mostly snowpack with intermittent dry patches. We put the skis on around 10,600ft. and skinned along the creek in La Plata Gulch for about a half mile and a few hundred feet to the base of the gully we used to reach the ridge. Bill elected to ascend this gully rather than the standard gully to avoid potential rock fall; and it was more filled-in. It was also the only skinning we did all day, fortunately on nice snow.

Skinning in La Plata Gulch; the ascending couloir is marked:

After skinning about 200ft. up the small apron of the gully, we switched skis for crampons (which did not come off until the summit) and booted up the rest of it. We started on climbers' right; the gully steepened (max. slope ~42deg.) and we moved to climbers' left averaging 35 degrees. We made decent time up, and the surface granule on top of a hard base made for excellent crampon work.

Bill boots the 900ft. gully:

Me climbing the gully (with "Lackawanna" behind to the left, and Casco Peak to the right in the far distance):

Sayres BM looking good:

After a food break at 12,300ft., we headed southeast across a flat area to gain the Northwest Ridge near 12,800ft. Here, the winds picked up; the forecasted clouds had not come in yet and we were happy for the winds keeping things rather cool.

Bill crosses the flat area en route to the ridge:

Looking back down La Plata Gulch (photo taken from ~12,900ft.):

The next task was to climb a large buttress. The summer route bypasses this on the west side; we climbed directly up it.

Climbing the buttress along the Northwest Ridge:

It's really hard for me to climb with skis on my back - it slows me down tremendously and I know that I need to keep doing it to make it easier. Almost every hour I'd say, "I'm turning around." "NO, you're not. Come on," was his typical answer. For me, this climb seemed to go on forever and every time I'd ask what our elevation was, I was discouraged. But I kept moving at a rather slow pace. When I click into my skis, my mood shifts and I remember why I like to do this.

Route to the summit (photo taken from ~13,450ft.):

Final push to the summit:

We finally made the summit in record time at noon (7hrs. total including several breaks), greeted with gusty winds and great views of surrounding peaks. A 30 minute summit break entailed the usual skin-stripping, snack, and preparing to ski. The day before, Bill scoped out a couloir to ski on the North Face far skiers' left along the ascent ridge, and that's what he planned to ski provided conditions were right. And clouds finally started to trickle in. He left the summit with his infamous words to me, "Don't fall."

Bill skis off the summit:

And I followed, as we dropped a few hundred feet down the summit ridge:

Bill went to check out conditions in the intended couloir (the next couloir skiers' right of the one we ended up skiing), but wasn't completely comfortable with snow conditions. So, we skied a shorter but steeper couloir instead (entry slope angle: ~39deg.; average slope angle: ~36deg.; max. slope angle: ~40deg.). Fun!

Bill dropped in first and cut across to skiers' right side of the couloir:

On this side, we found recent blown-in creamy powder to ski in. I dropped in, traversed over, and met Bill down at a safety zone above a rock outcropping.

Looking down the couloir as Bill stands at a safety-zone. The little sub-couloir we skied in is marked:

My turn in the upper part of the couloir:

At the outcropping, we decided to ski a mini-couloir (~40deg.) skiers' right of the primary. I went first and jumped with all my weight on the snow - it wasn't going to move, and I skied more of the same cross-loaded (but stable) creamy snow down to a second safety zone just above another outcropping where it merged with the main couloir.

Looking down the main couloir (left side) and the sub-couloir (marked, right side) to the next safety zone from the first safety zone:

I ski the mini-couloir:

Middlebrook hit it next:

From the second outcropping, we traversed to another safety zone across the main couloir to avoid the fall-line and the hard, crusty snowpack in the middle of the couloir. This was skiers' left side of the couloir and the snow was a bit slushier and a little less stable from sun-hit.

Bill skied to the next safety zone - the small patch of rocks on the left side of the photo. This photo also shows the remainder of the couloir to the basin:

We made a few turns here and cut back across to skiers' left once the slope angle lessened a bit.

Me skiing from the third safety zone (top 2 photos), finishing off the couloir (middle photo), and into La Plata Basin (bottom 2 photos):

Bill finishes his North Face ski and into the basin:

Admiring the fun ski from La Plata Basin:

A closer look at the line from the basin - safety zones are labeled:

La Plata Basin is huge - the biggest basin I've seen thus far and it just keeps going. The next goal was to intersect the main trail several hundred feet about the second (log bridge) stream crossing. We contoured along the west side of the basin, staying as high as we could and skiing through dust fields until we hit the forest. Skiing definitely was a little trickier here in such soft snow so we tried to link areas of shade. It didn't help having the wax stripped off the skis from the dust layer either trying to get through post-hole heaven. Luckily the forest wasn't too thick.

Contouring the west side of the massive basin:

Around 10,700ft., we found a dry area and Bill spotted the trail 30 feet below us. It takes so much energy to get through the snow in the forest this time of year and we were exhausted. Skis came off here and another food break was mandatory. We still had about a mile to go on the main trail hoping that it wasn't similar to what we had just skied through. It actually wasn't as bad as I thought - still post-holed, but a lot of the snow was still fairly hard. Tired, we hardly cracked a word and made it back to the car at 5:00pm, 12 hours after we started. It was a good day and a fun ski, but definitely a tougher Sawatch climb (in snow conditions) in my opinion. One of the more notable things was that neither of us hit any rocks skiing down - a nice amount of snowpack this time of year. Thanks for forcing me to the summit Bill! The couloir off the direct summit would be nice to hit, but I won't be back there anytime soon though.

Thumbnails for uploaded photos (click to open slideshow):

 Comments or Questions

nice pic‘s
02/05/2011 00:22
I like how you formatted you pictures. Nice job.

Looks like a lot of red dusty snow out there.......


05/04/2009 03:08
Hey guys good work, nice line. In your opinion How much longer do you think it will be possible to ski off the true summit?


05/04/2009 04:13
Nice job guys! Great line and TR, I‘m gonna have to try to squeeze this one in before the season is out. Boo on dusty snow...


You beat the weather.
05/04/2009 06:32
Looks like this one has several more weeks of fun left. You guys got it in prime conditions though. Great pics. I like the insets. Maximum viewage with minimal scrolling.


05/04/2009 11:43
I spent a little part of the rainy Saturday messing around on Photoshop because I never really had before. The insets are a nice way to combine what otherwise would have been a 60+ photo TR. But, I don‘t think I‘ll be doing that too often with trip reports! Thanks!


"a little tricky here"
05/04/2009 13:12
Hit Elbert the day prior to your summit and it is UNREAL how unsupportive the snowpack is at treeline and below. The combination dust layer and lack of hard freezes made for some interesting 2/3 body postholes - glad to hear you guys avoided such experiences for the most part.

Due to our decision to maximize our turns (oops...), our descent ended up taking a few hours longer than our ascent. Live and learn..

Nice effort!

Chicago Transplant

05/04/2009 14:11
That dust layer sure is grippy, and definitely makes for some funky skiing!
Glad you had a fun ski, there are some nice looking lines all over that face of LaPlata. Nice job!


Great job!
05/04/2009 14:13
I love the pictures, Caroline! Can tell you put a lot of work into this one, and it does it justice. Skis or not, that mountain is just plain steep, so I would be blaming that for your perceived slow pace. Would have taken me 8 hours with a tail wind and no pack!


Fun day!
11/30/2010 17:28
What?!? No photos of us floundering in the deep, collapsible snow below tree line? Rarely am I that happy to see a trail. I'm just glad it was breezy and overcast or we would still be there.
Another summit shot:

Great write-up, Caroline.


05/04/2009 15:58
did you guys dig a pit?? if so, what did you find?


11/30/2010 17:28
IMO, a pit wasn't necessary on the line we skied - the snow was very consolidated. The one area (the top of a couloir slightly to the east) that I chose to avoid was because of obvious cross-loading from a few days earlier. The biggest concern in the couloir that we skied was some slop on skier-left side that was facing the sun.

If skiing a line on the more direct north face, I would recommend digging a pit because that snow was less-consolidated due to less sunhit.

Even though it was the north face of La Plata, we took a rather conservative line.


classic line
05/04/2009 16:42
I‘ve always wondered why more people don‘t climb this route too though, it‘s such a more aesthetic line up the mountain. Such a sweet snow climb that pops you right out onto the summit. Any particular reason other than it‘s probably a little faster to climb the ridge?

Great TR either way!


Thanks for the comments!
11/30/2010 17:28
Keith: I had fun playing with Photoshop; I really couldn't do anything else because I was so sore after the climb!

Bill: I ONLY WISH I busted out my camera when you ate it in the trees!!! One of the biggest regrets of my day. It was only a matter of time before you'd find some plug to post me down in the trees!

Or, I should have taken that pic of you texting your coordinates to on the summit! Nerd alert!

Gnar: I actually wondered the same thing. I guess this time of year it makes most sense to climb the standard route so, in case you get lost off-route, you're not racing against the clock to ski in such warm temps. Those couloirs look like great snow climbs.


I never fall! Well, sometimes.
11/30/2010 17:28
Caroline: Hey, my "wallow hole" was obvious in that picture that I posted. I believe you are refererring to my face-plant in the forest where it appeared I was wearing my ass for a hat?!? I was just digging a pit.

Gnar: The best part about skinning up La Plata Gulch vs. directly into La Plata Basin is that you can spend more hours out of sunhit. We didn't hit the sun until 12,600' at the bench below the ridge. Plus, we made quite a straight line on the ascent.


05/04/2009 18:03
Bill, good to see you in some appropriate footwear finally! Next: Dynafits


BD Factors
11/30/2010 17:28
I couldn't help but try them out! When I tried them, they reminded me so much of my Nordica Supercharger Blowers, that I bought 'em. Yup, I like them and they are plenty stiff enough. And the liner is sooo much better than the Scarpa Hurricanes that it reduces shin-bang. I like the weight of the Hurricanes for real short climbs, but the Factors are far superior for the descent.

I guess I have no reason NOT to mount up a pair of Dynafits on a pair of my skis! I like to experiment, so I'm sure I'll have one set up for next season.


Nerd Alert!?!?
05/04/2009 20:06
1001001 SOS
1001001 In Distress...


Nice line...
05/05/2009 19:59
...on what looks like a nice day. I like the creative ascent route. Beautiful work with the pix too.

Re: Nerd alert: There are 10 kinds of people in this world - those who understand binary and those who don‘t.


Education please...
11/30/2010 17:28
This is all very interesting, great job on the report and photos. For us non skiers, could someone please explain 'safety zones' and 'pit digging'?

   Using your forum id/password. Not registered? Click Here

Caution: The information contained in this report may not be accurate and should not be the only resource used in preparation for your climb. Failure to have the necessary experience, physical conditioning, supplies or equipment can result in injury or death. and the author(s) of this report provide no warranties, either express or implied, that the information provided is accurate or reliable. By using the information provided, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless and the report author(s) with respect to any claims and demands against them, including any attorney fees and expenses. Please read the Safety and Disclaimer pages for more information.

© 2017®, 14ers Inc.