LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Items that do not fit the categories above.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
bdloftin77
Posts: 1442
Joined: 9/23/2013
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 99
Trip Reports (2)
 

LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by bdloftin77 »

Saw this in an email thread and am just starting to read it. I thought some here might be interested.

https://essopenarchive.org/users/955971 ... /lidar.pdf
peter303
Posts: 3583
Joined: 6/17/2009
14ers: 34 
13ers: 12
Trip Reports (3)
 

Re: LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by peter303 »

So there are 2337 peaks above 10K in Colorado. That should keep the list-baggers busy. I wonder how many of these peaks have names?
User avatar
Boggy B
Posts: 968
Joined: 10/14/2009
14ers: 58  7 
13ers: 784 76
Trip Reports (57)
 

Re: LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by Boggy B »

Interesting. I once thought it might be fun to try and write an algorithm to automatically calculate prominences from LPCs, but if we're filtering out man-made features like cairns then doing this without manual intervention seems impossible, regardless of accuracy in the measurements and classification of returns. Even AI wouldn't be of much use for identifying stacked rocks since the control for that has to be sourced from recent beta organically. I suppose if we could map the highpoints within cm's of (horizontal + vertical) precision then you might train a model to successfully distinguish a cairn from a natural feature in many cases.

Thanks for the post!
User avatar
Scott P
Posts: 9893
Joined: 5/4/2005
14ers: 58  16 
13ers: 57 14
Trip Reports (16)
 

Re: LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by Scott P »

Boggy B wrote: ↑Thu Aug 14, 2025 5:13 pm Interesting. I once thought it might be fun to try and write an algorithm to automatically calculate prominences from LPCs
I believe Peakbagger does that, but often their elevations come out a little lower than the LoJ manually calculated LiDAR elevations. When there is a discrepancy, PB is always lower, so the must be filtering out man made objects somehow. Perhaps whatever auto calls they are doing are over-filtering at times? I'm not sure.
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
User avatar
Boggy B
Posts: 968
Joined: 10/14/2009
14ers: 58  7 
13ers: 784 76
Trip Reports (57)
 

Re: LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by Boggy B »

I mean, a rock is a rock. A person or AI might distinguish between a stack of rocks and a natural rock in a photo. Neither can tell the difference from a very imprecise 3D model of the same (excepting the ridiculous windbreaks on some summits, because they're big enough). I thought I read somewhere that PeakBagger uses DEMs, so that would explain general inaccuracy and loss of resolution.
HikerBox
Posts: 98
Joined: 5/21/2016
14ers: 58  4  1 
13ers: 185 15 2
Trip Reports (3)
 

Re: LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by HikerBox »

Boggy B wrote: ↑Fri Aug 15, 2025 8:56 am (excepting the ridiculous windbreaks on some summits, because they're big enough)
If you don't climb to the top of the windbreak the summit doesn't count
User avatar
Mtnman200
Posts: 1235
Joined: 9/26/2012
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 472
Trip Reports (85)
 

Re: LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by Mtnman200 »

HikerBox wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:30 am
Boggy B wrote: ↑Fri Aug 15, 2025 8:56 am (excepting the ridiculous windbreaks on some summits, because they're big enough)
If you don't climb to the top of the windbreak the summit doesn't count
If you don't do a headstand, the summit doesn't count.
Carl Blaurock headstand.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"Adventure without risk is not possible." - Reinhold Messner
User avatar
Boggy B
Posts: 968
Joined: 10/14/2009
14ers: 58  7 
13ers: 784 76
Trip Reports (57)
 

Re: LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by Boggy B »

Isn't that capturing the moment he bungled the jump and faceplanted into the summit? :lol:
HikerBox
Posts: 98
Joined: 5/21/2016
14ers: 58  4  1 
13ers: 185 15 2
Trip Reports (3)
 

Re: LiDAR Paper by John Kirk and Andrew Kirmse

Post by HikerBox »

Mtnman200 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:31 am
HikerBox wrote: ↑Tue Aug 19, 2025 8:30 am
Boggy B wrote: ↑Fri Aug 15, 2025 8:56 am (excepting the ridiculous windbreaks on some summits, because they're big enough)
If you don't climb to the top of the windbreak the summit doesn't count
If you don't do a headstand, the summit doesn't count.
Truth!