Saint Helens vs Shasta
Forum rules
- This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
- Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
- Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
- Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
-
Enabreu
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 6/23/2024
- Trip Reports (0)
Saint Helens vs Shasta
I’m curious if anyone has done both, with snow, that could give me an idea of how they compare. Just climbed Saint Helens, so I got a taste of how long and steep that last mile is. Elevation aside, I’m curious to know how it compares to the section on Shasta before the Red Banks. Is the incline and difficulty pretty comparable, or is one much steeper than the other?
Re: Saint Helens vs Shasta
Assuming you were on the Worm Flow route of MSH, I don’t think there is a drastic difference in steepness. Route descriptions for Avalanche Gulch list the steepness at 30-35 degrees and I think the Worm Flows is described as up to 30 degrees. That said, the section before the Red Banks on Shasta was pretty icy when we did it (late May) and we used crampons and ice axes. We only used Microspikes on MSH. I thought the sketchiest part of MSH was making our way over to the summit proper and back, which not a lot of other groups seemed to be doing when we were there.
“Climb mountains not so the world can see you, but so you can see the world.” -David McCullough?
-
Enabreu
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 6/23/2024
- Trip Reports (0)
Re: Saint Helens vs Shasta
Awesome, thank you! 
