Colorado LiDAR Findings

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Dobsons
Posts: 160
Joined: 4/5/2007
14ers: 58  6 
13ers: 501 4 17
Trip Reports (12)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Dobsons »

I've had a ton of fun geeking out over some of the LiDAR data you guys are analyzing and find this all very interesting. I included soft ranked peaks in my 14er and Cent list just because it seemed logical and reasonable as they were all so close to the other truly ranked peaks. There are so many soft ranked peaks on the lower 13ers I hadn't been going out of my way to get those soft ranked peaks as the 13er list is so formidable anyways. However, it's amazing the technology we have now to get these elevations so accurate and pretty cool that we will likely be adding some new "ranked peaks" and maybe dropping a few. I for one wouldn't be depressed if "lightening pyramid" drops off the bicent list that's for sure but if it stays I am sure it will be a cool adventure too! I'll look forward to seeing how everything shakes out once all the data crunching is completed.

It seems like the "new" buckskin summit is the one closer to Tweto AND to Democrat. The previous summit was slightly off the connecting ridge from Tweto and Democrat towards Loveland Mountain. Now it's the high point right on that connecting ridge. Interestingly most my maps seem to put the name buckskin by the "new" summit and not the one that Roach, 14ers, and LOJ had listed as the high point. I had some fun looking back at my photos from 2010 of Buckskin analyzing if I did both and fortunately it seems my lame desire to touch every high point near by that could be a candidate paid off at least on that day by touching both summits. I think I vaguely remember my wife whining about dragging her to both but it's also funny how climbs from over a decade ago start to blur in the memory.
User avatar
Tornadoman
Posts: 1449
Joined: 7/30/2007
14ers: 58  10 
13ers: 298 41
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Tornadoman »

Dobsons wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:22 pm I for one wouldn't be depressed if "lightening pyramid" drops off the bicent list that's for sure but if it stays I am sure it will be a cool adventure too! I'll look forward to seeing how everything shakes out once all the data crunching is completed.
I wouldn't mind if Lightning Pyramid was unranked either! :lol:
Climb the mountain so you can see the world, not so the world can see you.
User avatar
Candace66
Posts: 262
Joined: 1/23/2017
14ers: 42  1 
13ers: 207 3
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Candace66 »

bdloftin77 wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:28 pm
The true summit of Mt Buckskin is a full meter higher than the spot elevation to the south east. The changed summit location is now reflected on ListsofJohn.com: https://listsofjohn.com/peak/95
Tee-hee, it's a good thing I decided to mosey over there after visiting the high point formerly known as the summit. :lol: (And it's a good thing I actually wrote up a trip report, cuz I sure don't remember the details of that 2001 outing!)

I'm waiting to see Lidar results for Death Valley. The continent's low point should be there somewhere. People (including myself) have visited the -282 spot elevation in Badwater Basin. But who knows if that's really the low point.
User avatar
Candace66
Posts: 262
Joined: 1/23/2017
14ers: 42  1 
13ers: 207 3
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Candace66 »

cougar wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:37 pm He's probably waiting to climb them all first to be the first finisher before updating the list...
I keep checking this, which was promoted to a ranked 12er. But still no ascents as of today (Nov. 11, 2021):

https://listsofjohn.com/peak/1742

I'm still amazed that peak went from 280' prominence to 452' measured by Lidar! :shock: Sure seems like it should have been obvious it was ranked!?
User avatar
Boggy B
Posts: 956
Joined: 10/14/2009
14ers: 58  7 
13ers: 784 76
Trip Reports (57)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Boggy B »

The addition of this route to MP last month was timely.
Based on the garbage description, it's super unclear what they actually climbed, but the photo of the "Western Mountaineer's Route" looks like what I would have guessed is the easiest route up The Castles E.
Note the 2 prominent horizontal seams.
castlesE.jpg
Claimed FA July 2017.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
justiner
Posts: 4929
Joined: 8/28/2010
14ers: 3  1 
Trip Reports (40)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by justiner »

Dobsons wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:22 pm It seems like the "new" buckskin summit is the one closer to Tweto AND to Democrat. The previous summit was slightly off the connecting ridge from Tweto and Democrat towards Loveland Mountain.
Huh! My chips were on the point near Loveland Mountain. Guess I was wrong!
Long May You Range! Purveyors of fine bespoke adventures
TomPierce
Posts: 2759
Joined: 11/21/2007
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by TomPierce »

As for The Castles, huh, go figure. I'd try that, looks to be mostly face climbing based on that route pic. Twin ropes for the impact foce, Screamers, etc...easy!

Actually probably a loose horror-fest way above gear :shock: , but worth a look.

-Tom
User avatar
Scott P
Posts: 9876
Joined: 5/4/2005
14ers: 58  16 
13ers: 57 14
Trip Reports (16)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Scott P »

Candace66 wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 7:40 pmI'm still amazed that peak went from 280' prominence to 452' measured by Lidar! :shock: Sure seems like it should have been obvious it was ranked!?
Rock towers are often hard to get prominence figures on. Some of them don't even show up on the topo maps at all.

Here's an example (Turkey Monster in Oregon):
gapwrziyzog71.jpg
It doesn't even show up at all on the topo map and wasn't even on Listsofjohn until I started a forum post on it. It might even be ranked.

Right outside Grand Junction, Kissing Couple wasn't ranked on LoJ until Ryan Marsters provided a pretty good measurement of it.

In places like Fisher Towers, the prominence figures are probably pretty far off (including on LoJ) for many of them since vertical towers usually don't translate to topo maps well.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
User avatar
supranihilest
Posts: 960
Joined: 6/29/2015
14ers: 58  45 
13ers: 752 2 8
Trip Reports (122)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by supranihilest »

Boggy B wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 9:36 pm The addition of this route to MP last month was timely.
Based on the garbage description, it's super unclear what they actually climbed, but the photo of the "Western Mountaineer's Route" looks like what I would have guessed is the easiest route up The Castles E.
Note the 2 prominent horizontal seams.
castlesE.jpg

Claimed FA July 2017.
Rated 5.10 WTF on the route topo from the bottom, probably heavy on the WTF. :lol:
Scott P wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:03 amHere's an example (Turkey Monster in Oregon):
I'd be irrationally afraid that even bodyweight would increase the leverage enough at the top to snap the thing at the base. What a wild piece of rock.
User avatar
12ersRule
Posts: 2314
Joined: 6/18/2007
14ers: 58 
13ers: 160
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by 12ersRule »

Scott P wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:03 am
Candace66 wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 7:40 pmI'm still amazed that peak went from 280' prominence to 452' measured by Lidar! :shock: Sure seems like it should have been obvious it was ranked!?
Rock towers are often hard to get prominence figures on. Some of them don't even show up on the topo maps at all.

Here's an example (Turkey Monster in Oregon):

gapwrziyzog71.jpg

It doesn't even show up at all on the topo map and wasn't even on Listsofjohn until I started a forum post on it. It might even be ranked.

Right outside Grand Junction, Kissing Couple wasn't ranked on LoJ until Ryan Marsters provided a pretty good measurement of it.

In places like Fisher Towers, the prominence figures are probably pretty far off (including on LoJ) for many of them since vertical towers usually don't translate to topo maps well.
If we knew how tall those people in the pic are, we could figure out exactly how high that thing off the ground is.
Sh!tposting on the dot com since 2007!

List of peaks
Strava
User avatar
lukePlumley
Posts: 84
Joined: 8/14/2007
14ers: 52 
13ers: 271
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by lukePlumley »

It looks like North Noddle Heads is the newest member of the CO 5th Class Ranked peaks list. Great peak!


https://www.listsofjohn.com/mobile/peak/5026
"Ain't nothing to it, Listsofjohn made me do it!" -- Ice Cube
User avatar
Candace66
Posts: 262
Joined: 1/23/2017
14ers: 42  1 
13ers: 207 3
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Candace66 »

Boggy B wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 9:36 pm The addition of this route to MP last month was timely.
Based on the garbage description, it's super unclear what they actually climbed, but the photo of the "Western Mountaineer's Route" looks like what I would have guessed is the easiest route up The Castles E.

Claimed FA July 2017.
Not sure if I was ever aware of that website. But it looks to be class 4+ and bouldering routes, so not the sort of thing I do anymore. :)

So, there are bolts and a summit rappel anchor on the "Western Mountaineers" route, according to that description. That will make it easier for aspiring 12er completists. :mrgreen: