Log In 
Report Type 
Full
Peak(s)  Middle Palisade, 14,019'
Excitement Peak, 13,877
Disappointment Peak, 13,917
Bear Creek Spire, 13,726'
Date Posted  08/12/2021
Date Climbed   08/08/2021
Author  ellenmseb
 MidPal + Disappointment on Disappointment   

After 2 weeks of storms in California, I took advantage of a clear weather window to head out and climb Middle Palisade, my 7th California 14er and 56th US 14er.

The hike to Middle Palisade gains 7k' elevation, contains little good trail and lots of california class 3 (not just on the final summit push but also in the vicinity of lakes on the approach). It's most commonly day-hiked. But after my misery on the approach to Williamson & Tyndall's 12k' campsite from sea level, i knew that I could not climb from sea level to 14k' in a day. So I nabbed a last-minute, 1-person backpacking permit.

I worried about the smoke creeping southwards from the Tamarack Fire near Tahoe. I adjusted my later plans southwards from Yosemite to Mammoth for that reason. The smoke was thick in Bishop. But it quickly cleared as I drove up to the trailhead at 8k', and even more so as I hiked up. Nevertheless, one party turned back from their attempt on Norman Clyde Peak because of smoke. They were carrying rope; the 4th class route on that peak is notoriously hard to find. But I never encountered any debilitating smoke in my trip. I also encountered a party who had roped up for only Middle Palisade. I wonder why. They said they'd taken the Red Rock route - whose rockfall danger could only increase with rope. maybe it was a guide and client.

21254_11
You're supposed to be able to see those mountains from here...
21254_12
Smoke clearing...
21254_03
Finger Lake was the gem of the approach! Gorgeous.

I packed up the highest lake I could find, at 11.2k'. This might be the last comfortably-warm backpacking night of the year. 2 days later certainly was not.

21254_05
Milky way above campsite

I headed out at 4am because I was at that point planning to meet a climbing parter at 8pm the same night. Routefinding in the dark wasted a lot of time. Eventually I made my way to the Middle Palisade Glacier.

Even in its shrunken state, Middle Palisade Glacier was really cool to investigate! I still haven't seen its bigger and more impressive cousin, the main palisade glacier. It's completely dry, hard ice, and crevassed. Rockfall was heard like clockwork for the hour after sunrise. The glacier is bisected by a medial moraine, which I ascended.

21254_09
Northern half of Middle Palisade Glacier
21254_07
Southern half of Middle Palisade Glacier
21254_06
Ice cave under the toe of the glacier

Sad evidence of climate change: the routes up Middle Palisade have changed very recently with the recession of the glacier. There are two routes:

  1. Secor's Chute: Solid rock, required glacier travel to access as recently as last year, and even more so in 1992 when Secor first described it
  2. Red Rock Chute: Horrendously loose rock, no glacier travel

Reading beta from last year, I brought an ice axe in order to access Secor's Chute. But, the glacier has receded so much that I no longer needed to travel on the glacier in order to access it. I did pull out the axe and wander around the highest part of the ice investigating. But above the relevant part of the glacier, I could see only vertical rock.

Instead, I chose the easiest-looking line in the vicinity, which had been very recently deglaciated. The rock was solid, but it felt about 5.4 to me (similar to Waterfall Route on Emerson, and harder than 5.2 sections on Matthes and Tenaya). It was OK to upclimb in approach shoes, but I definitely wasn't downclimbing it! It's possible that there exists an easier line than the one i took. This 5.4 line was also glaciated when Secor described it as "3rd class"; so the "3rd class" description does not apply to it.

After upclimbing route #1 and downclimbing route #2, and under the assumption that I did find the easiest line on #1, I'd have to recommend #2 despite the loose rock, unless you are very confident soloing (the rock on #1 would take pro, but at that point just take #2 if you aren't comfy soloing #1.) Just be very careful of rockfall among your party... there won't be a glut of other parties like there are on Colorado 14ers.

I continued another 1500' of 3rd class up to Middle Palisade. Uneventfully but slowly, beause apparently 1 night's backpacking is not enough acclimitization.

21254_15
MidPal summit view

Next, I planned to traverse over to Disappointment Peak, whose only accolade is being an SPS peak and being very close to Middle Palisade. Disappointment pk was also my excuse for backpacking whereas most people would day-hike MidPal. And might as well get Excitement Peak between the two as well.

The traverse from MidPal to Excitement, and from Excitement to the Excitement/Disappointment saddle, was difficult, loose and tedious. I seriously do not understand the difference between 5.6 and 4th class. It took 2 hours. I arrived at the Excitement/Disappointment saddle at noon. My turnaround time was noon.

Ahead of me, I saw no easy way forward. The GPX track that i was following led to an overhanging hand crack with no feet. i suspect that another block had previously provided footholds, but had since fallen; there was evidence of rockfall below it. I tried two other routes. They were too hard to solo, and in fact I wouldn't rope up on them either because they're complete no-pro choss. This ate up 40 minutes. A 4th route looked unlikely but possible. My energy, time and water were running out. My obligation to meet someone at 8pm had been moved to the next day. But I was clearly signing up for a very late night. The call to turn around was obvious. The traverse back to MidPal took only 1 hour, although i was forced to re-summit it.

21254_16
One of the 3 routes I tried to ascend out of the Excitement/Disappointment saddle. I was able to climb the chimney in the lower-left, but the slab above it is harder than it looks (all loose, downward-sloping holds). I would've had to downclimb the same route if I chose to ascend it as well. I decided this is too hard to solo.

I packed up camp and started the tedious descent. When I was almost done at 10pm -- Only 2 miles of good trail back to the car -- I made a horrifying discovery: Big Pine Creek was too high to cross. It was ~3ft higher than on my ascent. This is strange because it's late season, a low snow year, no rain for a week, and a cool day. Anyways, I had 3 choices:

  1. Attempt to jump the 5ft gap across 3ft-deep, freezing, rushing whitewater from one tenuous boulder to another -- probably getting washed downstream to an icy death. (I saw glimpses of headlamps hinting that another party had done this; but they were a pair, not solo)
  2. Camp again and cross in the morning; oversleep because my phone was out of battery; be late to meet my climbing partner the next day
  3. Bushwhack 1.5 miles down the wrong side of the creek and intersect a road that had a bridge over the creek. Possibility of getting blocked by impenetrable willows.

I chose option 3. The bushwhack was bad - but not the worst I've done. I had to backtrack out of willows only once. My ice axe constantly got snagged on branches. It took 1.5 hours. Mercifully, 2 miracles happened:

  1. The road started earlier than it appeared on the map, shortening my bushwhack
  2. I found a sink outside an empty rental cabin - with working, running, hot and cold water! This was invaluable because I was coated in sweat from wearing long pants while bushwhacking.
21254_04
the Miracle Sink

I could've cried out of gratitude for these 2 miracles. I washed up in the sink and walked down the road by starlight (my headlamp dying only after I reached the safety of the road).

I slept about 40 minutes that night, met a climbing partner, and took an easy day packing into Dade Lake. On the 4th and final day of my trip and weather window, we climbed a classic aesthetic line, the North Arete 5.8 on 13er Bear Creek Spire -- and another classic 11pm finish.

21254_01
BCS north arete topo
21254_13
bear creek spire summit block ("5.6R" but actually 5.2 G imo)
21254_14
bear creek spire crux pitch, my first clean 5.8 trad lead

My GPS Tracks on Google Maps (made from a .GPX file upload):




Thumbnails for uploaded photos (click to open slideshow):
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16


Comments or Questions
TomPierce
User
Congrats!
8/12/2021 8:19am
Even though your first peak was a no-go, I applaud your decisions. Seemed like the right call when solo (e.g. if you fell in that slot when solo it'd probably be tough to get a signal out if you had a beacon; if no beacon, yikes...). Also congrats on your first clean 5.8 lead, looks like a good one.

-Tom


greenonion
User
Ahh the Sierra again!
8/13/2021 3:26pm
Ahh the Sierra again!


   Not registered?


Caution: The information contained in this report may not be accurate and should not be the only resource used in preparation for your climb. Failure to have the necessary experience, physical conditioning, supplies or equipment can result in injury or death. 14ers.com and the author(s) of this report provide no warranties, either express or implied, that the information provided is accurate or reliable. By using the information provided, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless 14ers.com and the report author(s) with respect to any claims and demands against them, including any attorney fees and expenses. Please read the 14ers.com Safety and Disclaimer pages for more information.

Please respect private property: 14ers.com supports the rights of private landowners to determine how and by whom their land will be used. In Colorado, it is your responsibility to determine if land is private and to obtain the appropriate permission before entering the property.