North Apostle, Mt. Hope, Mt. Aetna: Grizzly Peak

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
jsf80238
Posts: 132
Joined: 7/13/2014
14ers: 26 
13ers: 73
Trip Reports (0)
 

North Apostle, Mt. Hope, Mt. Aetna: Grizzly Peak

Post by jsf80238 »

About 10 years ago, in my late 40s, I hiked to the top of Mt. Hope via the standard route. There was one spot where I had to reach and haul myself up. That felt like climbing rather than hiking and so unnerved me I ended up taking the North ridge back down, which was a slog but did not feel dangerous.

Around the same time I hiked almost to the top of North Apostle. I turned around shortly before the saddle between North Apostle and Ice Mountain because my dog got injured. Without my dog I feel like I would have made it.

A few days ago I made it to the top of Aetna via the SSW ridge (probably should have taken the SSE ridge which looked easier once I was already committed). That was loose scree with a feeling I could have slid down the mountain without being exhaustingly careful. I would not have wanted to re-trace my steps back down (I continued over Mt. Taylor to get back down to my starting point).

So, my question: how does Grizzly Peak compare with North Apostle, Hope and Aetna in terms of exposure (falling or sliding to my death/serious injury)?
User avatar
Ed_Groves
Posts: 277
Joined: 6/6/2019
14ers: 39 
13ers: 12
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: North Apostle, Mt. Hope, Mt. Aetna: Grizzly Peak

Post by Ed_Groves »

I assume you are talking about the centennial Grizzly Peak at 13,997 feet. If so, I don't see any problems with feeling like you could slide to your death unless you just get way off route. I climbed this just a month ago on my first day at elevation after arriving from Missouri. After you cross the basin and start up through the rocks toward the ridge it is pretty loose, but you aren't going to be in horrific danger. Once on the ridge it is a pretty nice hike to the summit though I wasn't a fan of the loose area depicted in photo 12 of the East Ridge Route so I went up on the gendarme a bit to avoid the loose class 2 below. I thought the summit was awesome with some mild scrambling. Upon my descent I actually took the loose class 2 depicted in photo 12. It was no problem going down with trekking poles. I haven't climbed the others you mentioned yet.
Last edited by Ed_Groves on Tue Sep 01, 2026 7:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Education is the process of moving from cocksure ignorance to thoughtful uncertainty." (Utvich)
User avatar
jsf80238
Posts: 132
Joined: 7/13/2014
14ers: 26 
13ers: 73
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: North Apostle, Mt. Hope, Mt. Aetna: Grizzly Peak

Post by jsf80238 »

Ed_Groves wrote: Sun Aug 30, 2026 5:22 pm If so, I don't see any problems with feeling like you could slide to your death unless you just get way off route.
Thank you, Ed.