Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Marklim80401
Posts: 25
Joined: 6/6/2022
14ers: 58 
13ers: 62
Trip Reports (0)
 

Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by Marklim80401 »

Seeing that the 14ers and Centennial’s are so popular I was wondering how we can get these two mountains named. I hate that they’re just numbers and not names I think they deserve names!
User avatar
LifeIsGood
Posts: 107
Joined: 4/30/2020
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by LifeIsGood »

This is my chance to re-submit a suggestion someone made in an earlier thread: to let every Colorado 13’er finisher name a 13’er (how many finishers are there anyway?)

This may only be plausible as an unofficial list of names, but it would be so awesome!

None of the objections raised earlier seemed to hold much water.

This would be such a great way to honor the accomplishment of each of these athletes, who have demonstrated an extraordinary degree of skill, experience, and dedication.

Can someone with enough clout (because I have none) please spearhead this project???
User avatar
cottonmountaineering
Posts: 1103
Joined: 5/11/2018
14ers: 58  8  18 
13ers: 205 49 31
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by cottonmountaineering »

LifeIsGood wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2026 5:06 pm This is my chance to re-submit a suggestion someone made in an earlier thread: to let every Colorado 13’er finisher name a 13’er (how many finishers are there anyway?)

This may only be plausible as an unofficial list of names, but it would be so awesome!

None of the objections raised earlier seemed to hold much water.

This would be such a great way to honor the accomplishment of each of these athletes, who have demonstrated an extraordinary degree of skill, experience, and dedication.

Can someone with enough clout (because I have none) please spearhead this project???
heres a quick guide:
https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey ... -mountain/

i personally think naming mountains after people isnt appropriate, and even if you did name them after 13er finishers they need to be dead, but they certainly can be named something
User avatar
Anima
Posts: 52
Joined: 3/13/2021
14ers: 58  17 
13ers: 287 1 15
Trip Reports (7)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by Anima »

The unnamed 13ers are the best 13ers! No reason to ruin a good thing. In reality, it almost impossible to "officially" name a peak. Lots of rules and regulations.
Last edited by Anima on Sat Aug 22, 2026 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What is real will prosper.
User avatar
HikerGuy
Posts: 1535
Joined: 5/25/2006
14ers: 58 
13ers: 586 8
Trip Reports (9)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by HikerGuy »

LifeIsGood wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2026 5:06 pm This would be such a great way to honor the accomplishment of each of these athletes, who have demonstrated an extraordinary degree of skill, experience, and dedication.
Athletes? C'mon. It's just walking uphill for the most part. Dedication, yes it does take some dedication and persistence. There are few finishers because most people don't care about finishing lists, not because of some great ability beyond the average hiker. We don't do this for any external validation, it's a purely internal drive and reward process (plus possible mental disorder) that propels list checkers.
User avatar
LifeIsGood
Posts: 107
Joined: 4/30/2020
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by LifeIsGood »

cottonmountaineering wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2026 5:25 pmheres a quick guide:
https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey ... -mountain/
No, no, I mean we need an underground project! You know, F#@% The Man/ The Gov/ any type of Authority!
User avatar
greenonion
Posts: 2178
Joined: 10/3/2012
14ers: 52  1 
13ers: 2
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by greenonion »

LifeIsGood wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2026 5:38 pm
cottonmountaineering wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2026 5:25 pmheres a quick guide:
https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey ... -mountain/
No, no, I mean we need an underground project! You know, F#@% The Man/ The Gov/ any type of Authority!
I thought Life is Good.
User avatar
LifeIsGood
Posts: 107
Joined: 4/30/2020
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by LifeIsGood »

greenonion wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2026 5:46 pmI thought Life is Good.
But Life would be even Gooder if I had a list in hand, of colorful and unique peak names, that I could check off!

Just look at all the fantastic rock climbing route names!
User avatar
Eli Boardman
Posts: 775
Joined: 6/23/2016
14ers: 58  1  15 
13ers: 18 1
Trip Reports (16)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by Eli Boardman »

It seems this could fall to whomever writes the next CO 13er guidebook, at least if you want unofficial names. Idk, you also might get away with writing a printed book about CO peakbagging history, which could include the name suggestions from 13er/12er finishers who choose to partake in such a tradition, if it were indeed to become a tradition.

https://listsofjohn.com/glossary#Name 8)
User avatar
alexhenes
Posts: 144
Joined: 7/5/2005
14ers: 58  22  10 
13ers: 788 82 26
Trip Reports (77)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by alexhenes »

Giving unnamed peaks names is not just fun, it has a functional purpose.

Every so often measurement technology is improved and peaks are re re-measured. When an unnamed peak gets a new elevation its name also changes.

This makes existing trip reports, web pages and gps files confusing and difficult to manage. The reports and web page names on my site were updated with the new Lidar names (thanks Joseph!) but it was tedious. The file names and waypoints in my GPS files were not updated. Having real names makes sense.

I am a fan of locals giving unofficial names to mountain features (peaks, towers, ridges, couloirs, etc.) After all, many of the current unofficial names were assigned by the OGs who were pioneering in hob nailed boots back in day. Kinda tough to manage though. And while we are at it lets get some fun non-PC names vs. the same ol' stale stuff...( ie. East East Red), Dicker's Peck is currently the best named peak in the state and not even on purpose.

Hiker Guy:
Two obese golfers riding in a cart drinking beers, eating dogs and smoking cigars: "If golf is a sport... then we are athletes" :lol:
User avatar
desertdog
Posts: 719
Joined: 7/26/2011
14ers: 58  6 
13ers: 357 4
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by desertdog »

I like unnamed peaks.
The summit is a source of power. The long view gives one knowledge and time to prepare. The summit, by virtue of the dizzying exposure, leaves one vulnerable. A bit of confidence and a dash of humility is all we get for our work. Yet to share these moments with friends is to be human. C. Anker
User avatar
LifeIsGood
Posts: 107
Joined: 4/30/2020
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Naming 13,838 and13,820?

Post by LifeIsGood »

tmp.gif
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.