I'm not a hiker and have no SAR experience. I'm posting here because I'm one person among thousands of people worldwide who are scouring satellite images for Mr. Cook... and I need to post my comments where it might matter.Doug Shaw wrote:
(As an unrelated example to highlight the insignificance of a person in the wilderness, consider this picture in which I am standing in a fairly open area, wearing an orange shirt, no less. Can you find me? Notice anything else in the picture?)
First, I wish more people could see Mr. Doug Shaw's photograph! It is a perfect example of just how difficult it is to find an average 5ft 5inch to 6ft 5 inch person against Earth's backdrop of colorings.
Second, people tend to think satellites are all-seeing. But if seeing Mr. Shaw in a ground photo is near-impossible, imagine how much harder it is from 600 feet above earth...through thick trees...down crevices...around boulders.... in deep shadows...
I hope that Mr, Cook's predicament showcases the need for universal standards about what hikers can do to help SAR and searches by satellite. One of the online news outlets stated: "Cook was reportedly wearing khaki pants, a black long-sleeve shirt that said “Burton” on it, a dark navy blue or black jacket and a blue helmet, according to a Facebook post." Every time I read that, I cringe inside. If we cannot see Mr. Shaw in an orange shirt in a ground photo, how much harder to see khaki, black, navy blue, and blue against mountainous terrain-- especially when the CO area has orange-yellow treetops that I assume are the leaves changing? Those look like giant NE US ragweed plants on satellite! And against chocolate-color ground, or against blue-black mountainous formations? Impossible!
The hiking community needs to discuss what colors might stand out the most against most often trekked terrain. I'm wondering if hikers could design a mat with weighted corners to lay out on the ground with a universal distress symbol on it? It would need to be large enough to see from the air / space, though... It's beyond my expertise to make any terrific suggestion....
In frustration, I guess what I want most to say is searchers really want to find "you". We're invested in finding "you", even if all we can do is search images from our homes. If you'all with hiking experience can figure out something to make yourselves as visible as possible, you will help people like me spot you.
Also, I wondered if along established trails there could be mandatory locked rainproof "boxes" where hikers would be required to drop in their name on a pre-printed card? (Printing name-cards is inexpensive and light enough to carry 100 or so.) Then SAR could start at the boxes to "track" the last box that contains your name, to narrow down where "you" might be if you're lost or hurt.
Again, I'm not a hiker. I don't know what it is like to be a hiker. Please don't criticize me too harshly for my inexperience... But isn't it time to devise better ways to get rescued? Think not only from number of feet for flying a rescue airplane or helicopter, but also when looking down from 600 feet out in space to find your small presence in the wilderness. What would make you and your tent stand out if you're under trees right along a clearing? (Forget footprints unless you're in snow!)
Sad about Mr. Cook and feel for his family. We'll keep looking 'from above'. Whatever happened, I hope he has the stamina and fortitude to keep inching toward rescue or that someone comes upon him soon.
Please remember, it only takes a sprained or broken ankle for "you" to be in this situation. Please discuss some universal standards that will help "you" be seen.