Mt Blue Sky

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
pvnisher
Posts: 1747
Joined: 9/28/2006
Trip Reports (8)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by pvnisher »

Conor wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:02 pm state road built with state tax money. The federal government cannot charge you to use the road.
Are they still trying to charge everyone at the gate when they drive in, though?
User avatar
HikesInGeologicTime
Posts: 627
Joined: 10/28/2016
14ers: 58  11  18 
13ers: 68 3 11
Trip Reports (56)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by HikesInGeologicTime »

pvnisher wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 5:18 pm Are they still trying to charge everyone at the gate when they drive in, though?
My experience with explaining that I didn't intend to park at any of the lots, just do a drive-by to assess snow conditions in mid-June, was that they gave me a green slip of paper and let me in for free. I imagine the green paper would have done nothing to prevent getting a ticket if I had parked at Summit Lake or the summit, but it did get me a free look at the snow conditions.
"I'm not selling drugs, dude. Drugs sell themselves. I'm selling stoke!"
- Guy at the table next to mine at Alta's Slopeside Cafe, in what I can't help but selfishly hope were (will be?) his verbatim words to the arresting officer(s)
User avatar
Chicago Transplant
Posts: 4065
Joined: 9/7/2004
14ers: 58  12  24 
13ers: 699 46 35
Trip Reports (66)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by Chicago Transplant »

timisimaginary wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:39 pm
laswa-guide wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:46 pm Who's going to claim the first ascent of the peak since it was officially renamed?
it doesn't work that way. the mountain is still the same mountain, no matter what we humans temporarily call it. there's no such thing as a 2nd first ascent.
the first ascent of Denali was in 1913, over 100 years before it was renamed Denali. that record still stands. plenty of other mountains were climbed well before they even had an official name, those records didn't change just because someone finally decided to give those mountains a name.
Denali wasn't even officially named McKinley until 1917. Not sure if it had an official USGS name before, but it was Denali for probably hundreds of years to the native Athabascans so it probably was Denali for the first ascent :-D
"We want the unpopular challenge. We want to test our intellect!" - Snapcase
"You are not what you own" - Fugazi
"Life's a mountain not a beach" - Fortune Cookie I got at lunch the other day
User avatar
nyker
Posts: 3378
Joined: 12/5/2007
14ers: 58 
13ers: 25
Trip Reports (69)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by nyker »

In such renaming situations, where some sources have the new name, some sources have the old name (not to mention the human factor, some may not realize it's renamed, or just continue using the old name or have older printed maps, be new to the area or not realize it's the same mountain), how does that impact possible SAR operations? I imagine there will be some inconsistency in software/routing apps, GPS, not to mention hardcopy maps, etc..that could cause some confusion and time delays in an emergency situation.
curt86iroc
Posts: 215
Joined: 5/29/2013
14ers: 14 
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by curt86iroc »

nyker wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 4:21 am In such renaming situations, where some sources have the new name, some sources have the old name (not to mention the human factor, some may not realize it's renamed, or just continue using the old name or have older printed maps, be new to the area or not realize it's the same mountain), how does that impact possible SAR operations? I imagine there will be some inconsistency in software/routing apps, GPS, not to mention hardcopy maps, etc..that could cause some confusion and time delays in an emergency situation.
a simple name change is not going to impact SAR operations on evans. the team that supports that area is quite knowledgeable...
User avatar
Trotter
Posts: 1444
Joined: 6/5/2013
14ers: 58  5 
13ers: 254 2 8
Trip Reports (10)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by Trotter »

nyker wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 4:21 am In such renaming situations, where some sources have the new name, some sources have the old name (not to mention the human factor, some may not realize it's renamed, or just continue using the old name or have older printed maps, be new to the area or not realize it's the same mountain), how does that impact possible SAR operations? I imagine there will be some inconsistency in software/routing apps, GPS, not to mention hardcopy maps, etc..that could cause some confusion and time delays in an emergency situation.
I'm sure thats relevant for some lowly 12er and 13er that gets renamed... I climbed a unnamed 13er years ago, went to add it to my 14er checklist and couldn't find it. Turns out they had renamed it Mt Cosgriff in like the past week. I bet SAR would have been confused if I had needed to call them.

For mt evans / blue sky, I'm sure SAR will remember the old name for decades.
After climbing a great hill, one only finds that there are many more hills to climb. -Nelson Mandela
Whenever I climb I am followed by a dog called Ego. -Nietzsche
User avatar
daway8
Posts: 1460
Joined: 8/24/2017
14ers: 58  27 
13ers: 165 30
Trip Reports (81)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by daway8 »

Since so many of us like to obsess over pointless little details...

Would it perhaps make sense to rename the sub-summit for what's now known as Blue Sky??

Not that very many people pay attention to the existence of the sub-summits...
Screenshot_20231010-204615~2.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
peter303
Posts: 3570
Joined: 6/17/2009
14ers: 34 
13ers: 12
Trip Reports (3)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by peter303 »

I notice CDOT has changed the name already on its websites.

Recreation.gov uses old name.
User avatar
madbuck
Posts: 1016
Joined: 6/16/2009
Trip Reports (6)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by madbuck »

Looks like the news sources are all diligent about using the new name in their annual "road is closed for the season" articles.
Yet, they (and CDOT) still cannot be bothered to put "to vehicles" in such announcements, because of course roads are just for driving!

A silly, niche complaint, but there are examples of seasonal wildlife closures to all activities, or (e.g. Fall River Road) roads with different activity restrictions during the year. I had found some of it confusing in the past.
</end seasonal rant>
User avatar
HikesInGeologicTime
Posts: 627
Joined: 10/28/2016
14ers: 58  11  18 
13ers: 68 3 11
Trip Reports (56)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by HikesInGeologicTime »

madbuck wrote: Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:48 pm Looks like the news sources are all diligent about using the new name in their annual "road is closed for the season" articles.
Yet, they (and CDOT) still cannot be bothered to put "to vehicles" in such announcements, because of course roads are just for driving!
Nooo, don't spread the word! The more people think that the road closure means closed to everyone, whether that's hikers, bikers, unicyclers (yes, autocorrect, I know what that's supposed to say, but my rhyme scheme must prevail), skateboarders, interpretive dancers, or pogo stick-ers, the more room there is for the rest of us! :wink:
"I'm not selling drugs, dude. Drugs sell themselves. I'm selling stoke!"
- Guy at the table next to mine at Alta's Slopeside Cafe, in what I can't help but selfishly hope were (will be?) his verbatim words to the arresting officer(s)
User avatar
madmattd
Posts: 337
Joined: 12/2/2017
14ers: 48  15 
13ers: 95 5
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by madmattd »

HikesInGeologicTime wrote: Wed Oct 11, 2023 5:43 pm
madbuck wrote: Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:48 pm Looks like the news sources are all diligent about using the new name in their annual "road is closed for the season" articles.
Yet, they (and CDOT) still cannot be bothered to put "to vehicles" in such announcements, because of course roads are just for driving!
Nooo, don't spread the word! The more people think that the road closure means closed to everyone, whether that's hikers, bikers, unicyclers (yes, autocorrect, I know what that's supposed to say, but my rhyme scheme must prevail), skateboarders, interpretive dancers, or pogo stick-ers, the more room there is for the rest of us! :wink:
You forgot peanut-rollers :mrgreen:
User avatar
HikesInGeologicTime
Posts: 627
Joined: 10/28/2016
14ers: 58  11  18 
13ers: 68 3 11
Trip Reports (56)
 

Re: Mt Blue Sky

Post by HikesInGeologicTime »

madmattd wrote: Thu Oct 12, 2023 7:48 am
HikesInGeologicTime wrote: Wed Oct 11, 2023 5:43 pm
madbuck wrote: Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:48 pm Looks like the news sources are all diligent about using the new name in their annual "road is closed for the season" articles.
Yet, they (and CDOT) still cannot be bothered to put "to vehicles" in such announcements, because of course roads are just for driving!

Nooo, don't spread the word! The more people think that the road closure means closed to everyone, whether that's hikers, bikers, unicyclers (yes, autocorrect, I know what that's supposed to say, but my rhyme scheme must prevail), skateboarders, interpretive dancers, or pogo stick-ers, the more room there is for the rest of us! :wink:
You forgot peanut-rollers :mrgreen:
Has anyone done that on…not-Pikes yet? I’m seeing some off-season record-setting potential if it hasn’t already expanded to the northern peaks of the Front Range! :lol:
"I'm not selling drugs, dude. Drugs sell themselves. I'm selling stoke!"
- Guy at the table next to mine at Alta's Slopeside Cafe, in what I can't help but selfishly hope were (will be?) his verbatim words to the arresting officer(s)