Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Yeah, I can see how the forest service started to lose interest in this. That's becoming a maintained and non-permitted structure on federal land.
Anyway, I was thumbing through Roach's Second Edition the other night and on page 170, under the Lake Como Approach description he notes: "Lake Como is on private property."
Obviously it's not anymore, or was he mistaken? Perhaps it was thought the mining claim largely covering the ridge encompassed como? Or the forest service acquired the claim that previously did encompass lake como.
