Mount Lindsey Closure

Information on current and past 14er closures, usually due to private property issues.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Ptglhs
Posts: 1551
Joined: 1/6/2016
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 86 2
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by Ptglhs »

Ryan987 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:05 am So how are we new climbers suppose to complete our 14ers with this closure? Do people actually trespass or do they hike to the USFS boundary and call it done?
Legally there's no way to complete them. Lindsay and Bross are "closed." Practically there's no way the owners can enforce this closure: the private property lines are well above treeline and there's no guardshack, fencing, or cameras. Morally... Your call.
User avatar
Reg0928
Posts: 171
Joined: 8/17/2016
14ers: 58 
13ers: 285 2 11
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by Reg0928 »

Ryan987 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:05 am So how are we new climbers suppose to complete our 14ers with this closure? Do people actually trespass or do they hike to the USFS boundary and call it done?
That's up to you, buddy. It's your list.
User avatar
Gene913
Posts: 469
Joined: 12/15/2006
14ers: 58 
13ers: 11
Trip Reports (7)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by Gene913 »

Ryan987 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:05 am So how are we new climbers suppose to complete our 14ers with this closure? Do people actually trespass or do they hike to the USFS boundary and call it done?
Ryan987 - with 11 14er summits, there are more than 40 other peaks to spend time on before access to the summits of Lindsey or Bross become "first world problems" for you.
Maybe it makes more sense to figure out the Lindsey/Bross access conundrum after you've summitted 50+ peaks on the 14er list.
"If you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, and you say to this mountain, 'move from here to there,' it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you." Matthew 17:21
User avatar
Ed_Groves
Posts: 193
Joined: 6/6/2019
14ers: 33 
13ers: 11
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by Ed_Groves »

Gene913 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:32 am
Ryan987 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:05 am So how are we new climbers suppose to complete our 14ers with this closure? Do people actually trespass or do they hike to the USFS boundary and call it done?
Ryan987 - with 11 14er summits, there are more than 40 other peaks to spend time on before access to the summits of Lindsey or Bross become "first world problems" for you.
Maybe it makes more sense to figure out the Lindsey/Bross access conundrum after you've summitted 50+ peaks on the 14er list.
Good advice. I am working through the 14ers and have a few to do before Lindsey becomes an issue. However, I do check the status on Lindsey every few months. If it is still closed when I decide to hike it, I plan on contacting the land owner and groveling for permission. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't that what Daniel Hobbs did last year for his self-supported record FKT completing all the 14ers?
"Education is the process of moving from cocksure ignorance to thoughtful uncertainty." (Utvich)
Ryan987
Posts: 152
Joined: 8/7/2022
14ers: 40  4 
13ers: 14
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by Ryan987 »

Gene913 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:32 am
Ryan987 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:05 am So how are we new climbers suppose to complete our 14ers with this closure? Do people actually trespass or do they hike to the USFS boundary and call it done?
Ryan987 - with 11 14er summits, there are more than 40 other peaks to spend time on before access to the summits of Lindsey or Bross become "first world problems" for you.
Maybe it makes more sense to figure out the Lindsey/Bross access conundrum after you've summitted 50+ peaks on the 14er list.
Good points thank you everyone. This one encouraged me to save Lindsey's until the last few ones. Hopefully there will be a legal way up to the summit in a couple years!

As for Bross, I just went along with CMC "rules" that they consider the bypass the summit and counted it as-is. Dosent look like a very interesting peak anyway :-D
User avatar
justiner
Posts: 4680
Joined: 8/28/2010
14ers: 3  1 
Trip Reports (37)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by justiner »

Colorado may bolster liability protections for private landowners who let the public recreate on their lands
https://coloradosun.com/2023/01/11/legi ... cFJFheSD5E
Long May You Range! Purveyors of fine bespoke adventures
User avatar
Ed_Groves
Posts: 193
Joined: 6/6/2019
14ers: 33 
13ers: 11
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by Ed_Groves »

justiner wrote: Fri Jan 13, 2023 6:30 pm Colorado may bolster liability protections for private landowners who let the public recreate on their lands
https://coloradosun.com/2023/01/11/legi ... cFJFheSD5E
That link was posted above in answer to my bump of this thread.
Thanks anyway though. I hope something happens with it.
Ed_Groves wrote: Wed Jan 11, 2023 9:49 am
spoony wrote: Wed Jan 11, 2023 8:44 am We are just one day into the 2023 legislative session, so I would not get your hopes up too high, but this article suggests that at least one legislator is working on the issue: https://coloradosun.com/2023/01/11/legi ... al-access/
Good information. Thanks. I hope they can come to an agreement to solve this issue.
"Education is the process of moving from cocksure ignorance to thoughtful uncertainty." (Utvich)
onebyone
Posts: 637
Joined: 7/27/2012
14ers: 58  1 
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by onebyone »

Ptglhs wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:14 am
Ryan987 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:05 am So how are we new climbers suppose to complete our 14ers with this closure? Do people actually trespass or do they hike to the USFS boundary and call it done?
Legally there's no way to complete them. Lindsay and Bross are "closed." Practically there's no way the owners can enforce this closure: the private property lines are well above treeline and there's no guardshack, fencing, or cameras. Morally... Your call.
Yup.
OnlineOnline
User avatar
cougar
Posts: 1196
Joined: 8/9/2007
14ers: 58  2 
13ers: 142 2
Trip Reports (10)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by cougar »

Perry-Mason-Featured.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
http://www.listsofjohn.com/m/cougar

"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going."
"Bushwhacking is like a box of chocolates - you never know what you're gonna get."
"Don't give up on your dreams, stay asleep"
User avatar
nyker
Posts: 3372
Joined: 12/5/2007
14ers: 58 
13ers: 25
Trip Reports (69)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by nyker »

I wanted to climb Popo when I was in Mexico to climb Orizaba/Izta, it was considered moderately active and smoking and thus closed to climbing, so I wasn't able to, end of that.
Another peak nearby I planned on doing was temporarily closed off due to military operations, so end of that plan too. So, I just did the few I was able to. Life happens and you don't always can get what you want, plans change.

As far as ignoring the closures, if you knowingly trespass on private property just be prepared for potential consequences. Once on Antero, hiking up an hour or two before sunrise, I was met with an angry miner with a shotgun because he "thought" I might have been on his private mining claim and was not happy about it...nothing ended up happening, but was a bit alarming to have someone suddenly screaming at you at 4:00am pointing a 12 gauge at you.

Maybe you can offer the owners of Lindsey and Bross, cash to climb, then we can start another thread about greedy Lindsey owners charging people to "take a walk" and Ptglhs can lecture everyone again about the benefits of communism and the evils of the ideas of private property and capitalism.
Ptglhs
Posts: 1551
Joined: 1/6/2016
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 86 2
Trip Reports (4)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by Ptglhs »

nyker wrote: Sat Jan 14, 2023 5:41 am Maybe you can offer the owners of Lindsey and Bross, cash to climb, then we can start another thread about greedy Lindsey owners charging people to "take a walk" and Ptglhs can lecture everyone again about the benefits of communism and the evils of the ideas of private property and capitalism.
Straw man argument., but I guess insulting someone and lying about them is easier than understanding their point of view.
User avatar
Scott P
Posts: 9598
Joined: 5/4/2005
14ers: 58  16 
13ers: 50 13
Trip Reports (16)
 

Re: Mount Lindsey Closure

Post by Scott P »

Ryan987 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 9:05 am So how are we new climbers suppose to complete our 14ers with this closure?
In the case of Lindsey, I wouldn't worry about it and would just wait. The owners have said that they want to open it back up and provide free access; they just want a legislative change on the liability laws. It is likely that this will happen.

When it does happen though, I'd suggest climbing all the ones with private land issues early on in case they get closed down the road. As of right now, for example, Sherman is private land and there are no current issues, but there might be down the road.

Lindsay will likely open up withing 0-3 years so just sit tight.
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.