North Arapaho? It used to have a huge pile of rocks on top, I don't know if it's still there.bdloftin77 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:29 am To be on the safe side, I'm going back through any 13ers with known summit structures (towers, buildings, ruins, tall poles) to make sure the structures were excluded. Can anyone think of any others I could look at? So far I've checked the ones below:
Quail Mountain (cabin ruins)
Fairview Peak (fire lookout tower)
Horseshoe Mountain (old building)
Mt Eva (radio tower)
Tower Mountain (radio tower)
Kuss Peak (building/radio tower)
Peak 8 (small radio tower)
Peak 10 (large pole)
Clinton Peak (large pole)
LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
Forum rules
- This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
- Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
- Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
- Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
=============================================
https://listsofjohn.com/m/Candace+Skalet
https://peakbagger.com/climber/climber.aspx?cid=29263
https://listsofjohn.com/m/Candace+Skalet
https://peakbagger.com/climber/climber.aspx?cid=29263
- bdloftin77
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: 9/23/2013
- 14ers: 58 1
- 13ers: 71
- Trip Reports (2)
- Contact:
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
Good find! We'll have to keep that in mind for when there's coverage for that area.
Thanks! That large cairn was excluded.Candace66 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 1:51 amNorth Arapaho? It used to have a huge pile of rocks on top, I don't know if it's still there.bdloftin77 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:29 am To be on the safe side, I'm going back through any 13ers with known summit structures (towers, buildings, ruins, tall poles) to make sure the structures were excluded. Can anyone think of any others I could look at? So far I've checked the ones below:
Quail Mountain (cabin ruins)
Fairview Peak (fire lookout tower)
Horseshoe Mountain (old building)
Mt Eva (radio tower)
Tower Mountain (radio tower)
Kuss Peak (building/radio tower)
Peak 8 (small radio tower)
Peak 10 (large pole)
Clinton Peak (large pole)
-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 5/23/2011
- 14ers: 58 3
- Trip Reports (1)
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
I seem to recall there being a huge cairn on "Baldy no es Cinco"bdloftin77 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:29 am To be on the safe side, I'm going back through any 13ers with known summit structures (towers, buildings, ruins, tall poles) to make sure the structures were excluded. Can anyone think of any others I could look at? So far I've checked the ones below:
Quail Mountain (cabin ruins)
Fairview Peak (fire lookout tower)
Horseshoe Mountain (old building)
Mt Eva (radio tower)
Tower Mountain (radio tower)
Kuss Peak (building/radio tower)
Peak 8 (small radio tower)
Peak 10 (large pole)
Clinton Peak (large pole)
- bdloftin77
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: 9/23/2013
- 14ers: 58 1
- 13ers: 71
- Trip Reports (2)
- Contact:
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
Yep, this was excluded. Thanks!Flyingfish wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 8:36 amI seem to recall there being a huge cairn on "Baldy no es Cinco"bdloftin77 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 11:29 am To be on the safe side, I'm going back through any 13ers with known summit structures (towers, buildings, ruins, tall poles) to make sure the structures were excluded. Can anyone think of any others I could look at? So far I've checked the ones below:
Quail Mountain (cabin ruins)
Fairview Peak (fire lookout tower)
Horseshoe Mountain (old building)
Mt Eva (radio tower)
Tower Mountain (radio tower)
Kuss Peak (building/radio tower)
Peak 8 (small radio tower)
Peak 10 (large pole)
Clinton Peak (large pole)
- JoeGrim
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 5/2/2017
- 14ers: 3
- 13ers: 8
- Trip Reports (0)
- Contact:
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
I suggest you let John Kirk know about it now, so that it can make it into his data base as a potential ranked peak. Then, once we get LiDAR coverage for that area, feel free to remind us to analyze it. I'm guessing there's a ~98% chance it's ranked, based on previous experience analyzing peaks with 360' interpolated prominence.Scott P wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 5:45 pm For anyone so inclined, I believe I found a ranked summit in Utah that was missed on LoJ for some interesting reasons/topography.
Coordinates:
37.41811,-110.16284
The topo map is wrong, the creek/creek-bed actually cuts through the rock wall where the red line is marked (approximate). The big bed around hasn't been the creek-bed for probably thousands of years and is an interesting abandoned meander.
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
I put in on the LoJ forum hoping that he would see it:JoeGrim wrote: ↑Wed Feb 22, 2023 8:56 amI suggest you let John Kirk know about it now, so that it can make it into his data base as a potential ranked peak. Then, once we get LiDAR coverage for that area, feel free to remind us to analyze it. I'm guessing there's a ~98% chance it's ranked, based on previous experience analyzing peaks with 360' interpolated prominence.Scott P wrote: ↑Mon Feb 20, 2023 5:45 pm For anyone so inclined, I believe I found a ranked summit in Utah that was missed on LoJ for some interesting reasons/topography.
Coordinates:
37.41811,-110.16284
The topo map is wrong, the creek/creek-bed actually cuts through the rock wall where the red line is marked (approximate). The big bed around hasn't been the creek-bed for probably thousands of years and is an interesting abandoned meander.
https://listsofjohn.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1447
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
Not a 13er or 14er, but this was one of the most interesting findings:
https://listsofjohn.com/peak/218487
The map was pretty far off on this one and everyone has been climbing the wrong summit.
https://listsofjohn.com/peak/218487
The map was pretty far off on this one and everyone has been climbing the wrong summit.
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
- JoeGrim
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 5/2/2017
- 14ers: 3
- 13ers: 8
- Trip Reports (0)
- Contact:
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
I hope those visiting it in the past came from the correct direction, or brought a hand level and noticed it could be higher.
Here's another crazy find: https://listsofjohn.com/peak/218489
Map prominence was a measly 128', while actual prominence is 313'!
and no, this wasn't a case of one peak replacing another; the map was that far off!
Here's another crazy find: https://listsofjohn.com/peak/218489
Map prominence was a measly 128', while actual prominence is 313'!
and no, this wasn't a case of one peak replacing another; the map was that far off!
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
All but three did Red Mountain at the same time so came from the north.
Only John Kirk posted a GPS track though. If John Kirk missed the true summit it must be unobvious that the other point is higher since he seems meticulous about those kinds of things.
That one you point out is crazy as well.
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
-
- Posts: 567
- Joined: 3/7/2009
- Trip Reports (0)
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
No, it really was 1 peak replacing another. Mineral Hill on the NW corner of the Boreas Pass quad was ranked because it was higher than the 10868 map elevation. After 10868 got raised to 10906 it was now higher than Mineral Hill, so Mineral Hill got demoted. It's true that the saddle elevations on the LOJ entry for 10906 are very different for LiDAR versus the map but I think that's because it is referencing different saddles.JoeGrim wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:08 am
Here's another crazy find: https://listsofjohn.com/peak/218489
Map prominence was a measly 128', while actual prominence is 313'!
and no, this wasn't a case of one peak replacing another; the map was that far off!
Every village has at least one idiot. Successful villages choose someone else to be their leader.
- JoeGrim
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 5/2/2017
- 14ers: 3
- 13ers: 8
- Trip Reports (0)
- Contact:
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
Thanks for the correction, Dave.
- bdloftin77
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: 9/23/2013
- 14ers: 58 1
- 13ers: 71
- Trip Reports (2)
- Contact:
Re: LiDAR: Colorado 13ers and 14ers Completed
But there have been some pretty big map errors.
Eli’s WY Sharks Nose find was pretty big map vs lidar prominence difference (175’).
John’s CA Maclure Peak find bumped it up from interpolated 12,900’ to a low 13er.
I’m looking forward to the Sierra Nevada lidar being available for download sometime in mid 2024 (their estimate).
Eli’s WY Sharks Nose find was pretty big map vs lidar prominence difference (175’).
John’s CA Maclure Peak find bumped it up from interpolated 12,900’ to a low 13er.
I’m looking forward to the Sierra Nevada lidar being available for download sometime in mid 2024 (their estimate).