Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
Scott P
Posts: 9598
Joined: 5/4/2005
14ers: 58  16 
13ers: 50 13
Trip Reports (16)
 
Contact:

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by Scott P »

Below are some of the big cliff faces in Colorado that were mentioned in the thread and I threw in a few more for good measure. Obviously there are a lot more than these. All maps are at the same scale (default) so you can compare the steepness and height of each.

Alpine

Blanca Peak:

Up to 1500 feet depending on how you measure.

Image

Capitol Peak:

Up to 1900 feet, depending on how you measure. Not as steep as cliffs such as The Diamond, Painted wall or Warm Springs.

Image

Challenger Point/Kit Carson:

Possibly up to 1000 feet, but this is pushing it. From below the faces appear pretty steep, but they aren’t nearly as steep as some of the other ones.

Image

Crestones:

Up to 1800 feet on the Needle, depending on how you measure.

Image

Echo and McCauley:

1100-1200 feet depending on how you measure.

Image

Longs:

Up to 1800 feet depending on how you measure. The Diamond itself is said to be 1300 feet.

Image

Pyramid:

Up to 1800 feet depending on how you measure.

Image

Vestal:

Up to 1200 feet depending on how you measure.

Image

Non-Alpine

Peak 7071, Warm Springs Cliff:

The SW face of Peak 7071 is higher (~2000 feet), but Warm Springs Cliff (~1700 feet) is steeper (and still a ranked peak), though there is a class 2 walkup route.

Image

Painted Wall:

The west end is very steep for nearly 2300 feet. It’s not a peak though.

Image
Last edited by Scott P on Wed May 12, 2010 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
User avatar
its_not_a_tuba
Posts: 820
Joined: 8/13/2009
14ers: 36  1  2 
13ers: 5
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by its_not_a_tuba »

PKelley wrote:It's not a Tuba -

I have climbed both Lizard Head and Sunlight Spire. I can tell you that without question, that Sunlight Spire is a more difficult summit than Lizard Head. You may dismiss this as Sunlight Spire is not "ranked". There are plenty of difficult peaks out there. Many of which we probably don't know about.

PK
Wow, tuba goes to school today! I would count Sunlight Spire, but I have always heard that Lizard is much more difficult than it's rating would imply given the conditions. Personally I would rather be on a 5.10d that protects well as opposed to a 5.8 that is falling apart. Then again, I haven't done either so I am really not qualified to comment and should really just STFU about things I don't know about. I guess I'll just have to eat my words with a side of humble pie.... mmmmmm tasty.
"Wilderness settles peace on the soul because it needs no help. It is beyond human contrivance." -- E.O. Wilson
User avatar
Mark A Steiner
Posts: 1006
Joined: 4/14/2008
14ers: 3 
13ers: 11
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by Mark A Steiner »

You may want to include the north face of Uncompahgre into the discussion. According to my understanding, this face has never been climbed.
Not that I speak in respect of want: for I have learned, in whatever state I am, therewith to be content - Paul the Apostle.
Like it or not, I am a slow driver. Putt ... putt ... putt ...
Good day.
User avatar
Scott P
Posts: 9598
Joined: 5/4/2005
14ers: 58  16 
13ers: 50 13
Trip Reports (16)
 
Contact:

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by Scott P »

You may want to include the north face of Uncompahgre into the discussion. According to my understanding, this face has never been climbed.
It hasn't been climbed, but it is only 700 feet high.
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
User avatar
ajkagy
Posts: 2291
Joined: 1/7/2007
Trip Reports (0)
 
Contact:

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by ajkagy »

Scott P wrote:
You may want to include the north face of Uncompahgre into the discussion. According to my understanding, this face has never been climbed.
It hasn't been climbed, but it is only 700 feet high.
it's pretty crappy rock isn't it? I'm surprised it's never been aided at least, maybe a summer project? lol
http://wanderingthemountains.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
TWorth
Posts: 5
Joined: 12/15/2006
Trip Reports (0)
 
Contact:

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by TWorth »

For maximum drops(alpine or not) at 3 fixed horizontal distances you can view these lists which were developed from analysis of digital data:

max drop at 100m, CO top 200 summits

max drop at 800m, CO top 200 summits

max drop at 1600m, CO top 200 summits

Click on the angle figure for a map. Example

The measure is from summits only, so greater slopes can be found if the origin point is moved to the cliff edge. Customizing the x variable can also yield higher slope.
User avatar
Scott P
Posts: 9598
Joined: 5/4/2005
14ers: 58  16 
13ers: 50 13
Trip Reports (16)
 
Contact:

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by Scott P »

it's pretty crappy rock isn't it? I'm surprised it's never been aided at least, maybe a summer project? lol
If it's on a 14er and hasn't been climbed yet, most likely it is super-crappy rock.
For maximum drops(alpine or not) at 3 fixed horizontal distances you can view these lists which were developed from analysis of digital data:

max drop at 100m, CO top 200 summits

max drop at 800m, CO top 200 summits

max drop at 1600m, CO top 200 summits
Those are some awesome list! :D
I'm old, slow and fat. Unfortunately, those are my good qualities.
Kovar
Posts: 101
Joined: 9/9/2008
14ers: 16 
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by Kovar »

TWorth wrote:For maximum drops(alpine or not) at 3 fixed horizontal distances you can view these lists which were developed from analysis of digital data:

max drop at 100m, CO top 200 summits

max drop at 800m, CO top 200 summits

max drop at 1600m, CO top 200 summits

Click on the angle figure for a map. Example

The measure is from summits only, so greater slopes can be found if the origin point is moved to the cliff edge. Customizing the x variable can also yield higher slope.
Awesome lists. Thanks for sharing.
TWorth
Posts: 5
Joined: 12/15/2006
Trip Reports (0)
 
Contact:

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by TWorth »

Thanks guys. With digital data becoming more accurate lists like this are now possible. Good to have a measure that is objective - ie doesn't play favorites.

Scott, looks like you called a lot of the steepest CO faces identified in the above lists like McCaluley, Warm Springs Cliff, Longs, Crestone, Serpent Point, etc. =D>

Just as a bonus, here are the lists for the 11 western states combined(top 3000):

Max at 100m
Max at 800m
Max at 1600m
RobertPetrowsky
Posts: 205
Joined: 5/23/2007
14ers: 20  4 
13ers: 8
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by RobertPetrowsky »

Is there any list out there that has the difficulty of those peaks or that would show how much of the peak has those drops? It would be interesting to see how some of our peaks rank up compared to some much larger ones that may have a walk up route that isn't indicated by this info.
TWorth
Posts: 5
Joined: 12/15/2006
Trip Reports (0)
 
Contact:

Re: Biggest Alpine Face in Colorado

Post by TWorth »

Is there any list out there that has the difficulty of those peaks or that would show how much of the peak has those drops? It would be interesting to see how some of our peaks rank up compared to some much larger ones that may have a walk up route that isn't indicated by this info.
Averaging the drop from all directions is better for showing how much of a peak has big drops. Average drop at 100m correlate well with technical difficulty. Take a look at the 100m avg CO list. There are a lot of 5th class peaks in the top 20.

One way to compare by state is to look at a numerical state by state breakdown of the top x summits in a list spanning multiple states. An example below is the breakdown for the steepest line lists shown above, looks like CO falls in the mid to lower half of the totals.

State totals, max at 100m
State totals, max at 800m
State totals, max at 1600m
Post Reply