14ers.com

Violet wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 7:35 am Compared to many of u here, I am probably still new for 14ers. So far I hv just finished 10 of them. I want to share some of my thoughts after reading the comments here, my personal opinion:
1、Going to the peaks of 14ers has “fatal” temptation. It is like a game, once it starts, u just don’t want to stop, which sometimes worried me because it is how I feel. I always tell myself before I leave for the next 14er: “just turn around if I feel potential danger, never try hard to make it to the peak in that case.” So I consider the activity for fun, not for a task or glory. I am pretty sure the same thing happened to Himalaya mountains in Asia because I read many stories about people climbing, mountaineering those highest sea level peaks in the world. People know the risk in front of them, they still go to explore them, nothing stopped them.
2、 I read many mountain fatal accidents both in Colorado and in Himalaya mountains not for just being “nosy” about others businesses, I want to know what happened and what those beautiful stories behind those lives who passed away in accidents .
3、 A documentary called < Torn> impressed me very much. It is based on a true story about American famous climber Alex Lowe who died in an avalanche in Shisha Pangma in Tibet and his family.

Rock-a-Fella wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 7:51 pm There may be something I have missed but I am not sure that ANYONE other than the climber knows what happened and thus those seeking to establish where the lines are may be disappointed.

I think timing has a lot to do with “what is appropriate to discuss” and “Where to Discuss it”.

I don’t think anyone knows the antecedent to the fall and thus “conjecture” is what is left. If you don’t know the mountain intimately then you will not even be good at conjecture either.

Overlook wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 2:03 pm I agree. Just bad luck. From what I can tell, Sarah was skilled, focused, athletic, and likely not prone to mistakes. See this trip report from 11/2015 where someone was just a tad luckier through no fault of their own.
https://www.14ers.com/php14ers/triprepo ... trip=16683

timisimaginary wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 4:02 pm

Rock-a-Fella wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 7:51 pm There may be something I have missed but I am not sure that ANYONE other than the climber knows what happened and thus those seeking to establish where the lines are may be disappointed.

I think timing has a lot to do with “what is appropriate to discuss” and “Where to Discuss it”.

I don’t think anyone knows the antecedent to the fall and thus “conjecture” is what is left. If you don’t know the mountain intimately then you will not even be good at conjecture either.

it's not conjecture. according to the initial reports, several people were on the ridge and witnessed the fall. that is why we know as much as we do about where and how the accident happened. that's a lot more than is typically known about falls or accidents involving solo climbers in the mountains. there may or may not be lessons or conclusions can be drawn from that info, but you don't know if you don't ask. some people here perplexingly don't even want anyone to ask.



i agree that conjecture about accidents is often pointless and can even veer into disrespectful or insensitive territory, especially when it occurs without witnesses or other sources of data (GPS tracks, pictures, etc) to draw from. that wasn't the case for this accident however.

Rock-a-Fella wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 7:29 pm I will say it again. Witnesses saw the fall but that does not mean that they know what happened (unless you have more to offer) That makes it conjecture
“an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information.“ So while there were witnesses to the “Fall” , I know not of anyone how can speak to the antecedent. (Which it what I said in the post you read…..or not

John Landers wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 11:17 pm

Rock-a-Fella wrote: ↑Fri Sep 16, 2022 7:29 pm I will say it again. Witnesses saw the fall but that does not mean that they know what happened (unless you have more to offer) That makes it conjecture
“an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information.“ So while there were witnesses to the “Fall” , I know not of anyone how can speak to the antecedent. (Which it what I said in the post you read…..or not

Is it not conjecture on your part as to what the witnesses saw and how much they know about what happened? Have you ever seen something in sports or in a car and thought oh no, just as something unfolded in front of you?

Overlook wrote: ↑Sat Sep 17, 2022 6:07 pm