Re: False hypothermia rescue charges
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 10:48 pm
i suppose you also believe fire departments and police should charge when you call them too?Terminally_Chill wrote: ↑Sat Nov 13, 2021 8:24 pm As someone that comes from many generations of first responders in Colorado and has seen the effect that the intense population growth here in CO has had on the public land that my ancestors considered sacred, I'm just going to say it: hikers, climbers, base jumpers, etc. should have to pay for search and rescue. If you don't purchase hunting, fishing, or recreational vehicle permits (which go towards funding volunteer SAR in much of the west) you shouldn't be able to activate the search and rescue system for free.
In case you weren't aware, in certain areas fire departments do charge for their services. There's a company called Fire Recovery that recovers charges for fire department for certain services performed, but I believe it's only in select counties/statescurt86iroc wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:22 ami suppose you also believe fire departments and police should charge when you call them too?Terminally_Chill wrote: ↑Sat Nov 13, 2021 8:24 pm As someone that comes from many generations of first responders in Colorado and has seen the effect that the intense population growth here in CO has had on the public land that my ancestors considered sacred, I'm just going to say it: hikers, climbers, base jumpers, etc. should have to pay for search and rescue. If you don't purchase hunting, fishing, or recreational vehicle permits (which go towards funding volunteer SAR in much of the west) you shouldn't be able to activate the search and rescue system for free.
IMO, it needs to be the other way around. the state should fund SAR directly and everyone should pay for it through their taxes (just like EMS, Fire, Police etc.) regardless if they use it or not. that's my $0.02.
wow, i had NOT heard of them before...although some quick googling revealed they may be participating in some questionable billing practices.yaktoleft13 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 12:49 pmIn case you weren't aware, in certain areas fire departments do charge for their services. There's a company called Fire Recovery that recovers charges for fire department for certain services performed, but I believe it's only in select counties/statescurt86iroc wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:22 ami suppose you also believe fire departments and police should charge when you call them too?Terminally_Chill wrote: ↑Sat Nov 13, 2021 8:24 pm As someone that comes from many generations of first responders in Colorado and has seen the effect that the intense population growth here in CO has had on the public land that my ancestors considered sacred, I'm just going to say it: hikers, climbers, base jumpers, etc. should have to pay for search and rescue. If you don't purchase hunting, fishing, or recreational vehicle permits (which go towards funding volunteer SAR in much of the west) you shouldn't be able to activate the search and rescue system for free.
IMO, it needs to be the other way around. the state should fund SAR directly and everyone should pay for it through their taxes (just like EMS, Fire, Police etc.) regardless if they use it or not. that's my $0.02.
He is telling the truth. I was there with him. Of course, I was climbing without oxygen, but I wasn't strong enough to carry him down.XterraRob wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 5:42 pm It should become customary to tip your rescuers. I had to get rescued by NASA SAR back in '19 because my oxygen supply ran low at about 40,200ft on Olympus Mons. They showed up, put me in a pod, and shot me back to Earth. I wasn't charged since I didn't need to be MEDEVAC'd back to Earth, but I did tip them a couple hundos for saving my life.
These people put themselves in harm's way, selflessly, to save you, or your dog that got stepped on by a Moose during a nature walk. They deserve endless gratitude for the amount of s**t they have to respond to.