The number of peaks is less important than the association implied by the original post.tommyboy360 wrote:ok, call me the big A on the site. No need to debate... Ken is rad. Nothing to take away from that.
But what is up with 1800? Is that a special mark? Is there < 2000 or even < 1900 peaks in Colorado? I have not heard of the 1800 list/milestone before. I think most experienced folks knew he is was in the lead. Just curious...
Ken Nolan deserves mucho accolades for his drive, accomplishments, and humble attitude.
Yeah, Tommy, you're the big A...not.