Page 1 of 1

Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 1:05 pm
by Buckie06
It looks like they (Summit County, City of Blue Lakes? It's not quite clear) are conducting research on implementing paid parking, permitting, and shuttle services for the Quandary TH and McCullough Gulch TH in the future. Please fill out this survey and make your voice heard.

https://survey.rrcresearch.com/s3/Quandary-Peak-Survey
or
www.quandarysurvey.org

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
by JacobW
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:16 pm
by supranihilest
JacobW wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
Give 'er the ol' Bartlett Mountain treatment.

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:24 pm
by ltlFish99
JacobW wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
Or, transplant sunlight spire onto the top of it and ban aid climbing if the spire part.

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:09 pm
by HikesInGeologicTime
ltlFish99 wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:24 pm
Or, transplant sunlight spire onto the top of it and ban aid climbing if the spire part.
Ehhh, then people will either treat it like Sunlight Prime (reach the survey marker, but not the highest point) or team up to schlep either a ladder or a trampoline up to the base. :p

My actual suggestion was that the county consider adding a (seasonal, perhaps) stop or line to their existing bus service (which, last time I used it, was free). No idea what the additional costs would be to run that from/through Breck, but if they're discussing shuttles anyway, maybe they can take advantage of what they already have in place. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:10 pm
by Will_E
supranihilest wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:16 pm
JacobW wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
Give 'er the ol' Bartlett Mountain treatment.
Had to google that. Interesting...

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:33 am
by benmangelsdorf
Will_E wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:10 pm
supranihilest wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:16 pm
JacobW wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
Give 'er the ol' Bartlett Mountain treatment.
Had to google that. Interesting...
I just looked it up too. That summit block looks a bit nervewracking :cry:

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:39 am
by supranihilest
benmangelsdorf wrote:
Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:33 am
Will_E wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:10 pm
supranihilest wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:16 pm


Give 'er the ol' Bartlett Mountain treatment.
Had to google that. Interesting...
I just looked it up too. That summit block looks a bit nervewracking :cry:
The old "razor fang" summit block shown in photos on places like SummitPost is no more, as of at least April, 2020. The summit is now just a Class 2 pile of crushed rock. There is a half-destroyed tower a few hundred feet to the east that has the potential to eventually become the new summit, and it would be a very scary and dangerous climb. There are pics of the former in the body of my trip report, and some high-res pics of the nasty tower in the comments. The TR can be found here: https://www.14ers.com/php14ers/triprepo ... trip=20074

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2021 10:53 pm
by pw
Some more info on Quandary. Interesting what constitutes a stake holder. Would seem Grays/Torreys and Bierstadt might be candidates for this treatment.

“We’ve seen numbers increase pretty drastically,” Richardson said. “Last year the Colorado Fourteeners initiative trail counter at Quandary Peak counted 48,169 visitors.”

https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/04/15/ ... it-county/