Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Trailhead condition requests, questions, alerts, etc.
Forum rules
Please do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website. For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Buckie06
Posts: 103
Joined: 10/14/2012
14ers:summits43 ski2 winter4 
13ers:summits15 ski3 winter4 
Trip Reports (2)

Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by Buckie06 » Wed Apr 14, 2021 1:05 pm

It looks like they (Summit County, City of Blue Lakes? It's not quite clear) are conducting research on implementing paid parking, permitting, and shuttle services for the Quandary TH and McCullough Gulch TH in the future. Please fill out this survey and make your voice heard.

https://survey.rrcresearch.com/s3/Quandary-Peak-Survey
or
www.quandarysurvey.org
JacobW
Posts: 71
Joined: 6/15/2012
14ers:summits36 ski16 winter3 
13ers:summits17 ski8 winter3 
Trip Reports (2)

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by JacobW » Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm

Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
User avatar
supranihilest
Posts: 311
Joined: 6/29/2015
14ers:summits58 winter28 
13ers:summits392 winter10 
Trip Reports (91)
Contact:

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by supranihilest » Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:16 pm

JacobW wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
Give 'er the ol' Bartlett Mountain treatment.
ltlFish99
Posts: 365
Joined: 5/22/2019
14ers:summits40 ski2 winter2 
13ers:summits51 

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by ltlFish99 » Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:24 pm

JacobW wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
Or, transplant sunlight spire onto the top of it and ban aid climbing if the spire part.
User avatar
HikesInGeologicTime
Posts: 368
Joined: 10/28/2016
14ers:summits46 ski1 winter17 
13ers:summits48 ski1 winter13 
Trip Reports (28)

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by HikesInGeologicTime » Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:09 pm

ltlFish99 wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:24 pm
Or, transplant sunlight spire onto the top of it and ban aid climbing if the spire part.
Ehhh, then people will either treat it like Sunlight Prime (reach the survey marker, but not the highest point) or team up to schlep either a ladder or a trampoline up to the base. :p

My actual suggestion was that the county consider adding a (seasonal, perhaps) stop or line to their existing bus service (which, last time I used it, was free). No idea what the additional costs would be to run that from/through Breck, but if they're discussing shuttles anyway, maybe they can take advantage of what they already have in place. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"I'm not selling drugs, dude. Drugs sell themselves. I'm selling stoke!"
- Guy at the table next to mine at Alta's Slopeside Cafe, in what I can't help but selfishly hope were (will be?) his verbatim words to the arresting officer(s)
User avatar
Will_E
Posts: 231
Joined: 8/14/2018
14ers:summits58 winter45 
13ers:summits78 winter2 
Trip Reports (11)

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by Will_E » Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:10 pm

supranihilest wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:16 pm
JacobW wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
Give 'er the ol' Bartlett Mountain treatment.
Had to google that. Interesting...
User avatar
benmangelsdorf
Posts: 31
Joined: 10/13/2020
14ers:summits13 winter5 
13ers:summits18 winter1 

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by benmangelsdorf » Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:33 am

Will_E wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:10 pm
supranihilest wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:16 pm
JacobW wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:05 pm
Be sure to write in the "additional thoughts" field at the end that the best way to mitigate crowding would be to shorten the peak by ~270 feet.
Give 'er the ol' Bartlett Mountain treatment.
Had to google that. Interesting...
I just looked it up too. That summit block looks a bit nervewracking :cry:
User avatar
supranihilest
Posts: 311
Joined: 6/29/2015
14ers:summits58 winter28 
13ers:summits392 winter10 
Trip Reports (91)
Contact:

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by supranihilest » Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:39 am

benmangelsdorf wrote:
Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:33 am
Will_E wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:10 pm
supranihilest wrote:
Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:16 pm


Give 'er the ol' Bartlett Mountain treatment.
Had to google that. Interesting...
I just looked it up too. That summit block looks a bit nervewracking :cry:
The old "razor fang" summit block shown in photos on places like SummitPost is no more, as of at least April, 2020. The summit is now just a Class 2 pile of crushed rock. There is a half-destroyed tower a few hundred feet to the east that has the potential to eventually become the new summit, and it would be a very scary and dangerous climb. There are pics of the former in the body of my trip report, and some high-res pics of the nasty tower in the comments. The TR can be found here: https://www.14ers.com/php14ers/triprepo ... trip=20074
pw
Posts: 483
Joined: 7/10/2006
14ers:summits45 
13ers:summits70 
Trip Reports (1)

Re: Use Survey for Quandary Peaks Area

Post by pw » Sat Apr 17, 2021 10:53 pm

Some more info on Quandary. Interesting what constitutes a stake holder. Would seem Grays/Torreys and Bierstadt might be candidates for this treatment.

“We’ve seen numbers increase pretty drastically,” Richardson said. “Last year the Colorado Fourteeners initiative trail counter at Quandary Peak counted 48,169 visitors.”

https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/04/15/ ... it-county/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pwahl/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply