Re: Avalanche San Juans- The Nose
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:56 pm
Crap.
no it was just a thought experimentd_baker wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:36 pmEducation & avoidance is better.ker0uac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:33 pmRight, but I was wondering if it would help our current scenario, since it results from multiple deep weak layers dating back to late Fall.cottonmountaineering wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:26 pm but yes, ski resorts use explosives in targeted areas to make them slide
Are you suggesting blasting all BC areas in the state!? That's a lot of dynamite, or whatever explosive they use.
But ski resorts and CDOT repeatedly blast avalanche areas and get results after every major loading event. Its not just a one-and-done fix the weak layer and you're good to go, unfortunately. To do this in the backcountry would be impossible, and may even lead to more accidents due to the assumption that it is safe to send because its controlled. Not to mention the liability of controlling hundreds of thousands of acres with no ability to close terrain. I could keep going, but its better to accept the risk and base decision off of knowing the consequences of what can happen when things go wrongker0uac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:23 pm Does an avalanche due to weak snowpack make a slope safer? Though not practical, one solution to address CO weak snowpack is to safely trigger massive avalanches everywhere? That way, future snow can accumulate on top of stable layers? Just asking out of intellectual curiosity.
That's what Dr. K does with his Rock-down-a-Couloir avalanche mitigation strategy.ker0uac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:23 pm Does an avalanche due to weak snowpack make a slope safer? Though not practical, one solution to address CO weak snowpack is to safely trigger massive avalanches everywhere? That way, future snow can accumulate on top of stable layers? Just asking out of intellectual curiosity.
Immediately after a slide, yes, it's often safe.ker0uac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 4:23 pm Does an avalanche due to weak snowpack make a slope safer? Though not practical, one solution to address CO weak snowpack is to safely trigger massive avalanches everywhere? That way, future snow can accumulate on top of stable layers? Just asking out of intellectual curiosity.
Wow that’s big. I saw the Sherriff and SAR On the way home from Vail. Looks like another fatality. The snow was great but it’s not surprising the other side of the rope would slide on a day like today.
They also have those here protecting Hwy 40 on Berthoud Pass, Hwy 6 on Loveland Pass, and I-70 around the tunnel.pvnisher wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:00 am I remember seeing a bunch of big funnels and massive pipes in the Alps.
They use propane burst, like a potato cannon or ground burst simulators some of you might be familiar with, to keep slide areas along the highway safe.
It's a big installation, not for backcountry, but I assume they've got radio receivers so they can just set them off from time to time.
I think it was briefly mentioned earlier this season before we had any snow but it's more relevant now than ever - CAIC's recent study about the experience level of who is involved in avalanche incidents is telling. It's a bell curve.Carl_Healy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 04, 2021 12:06 pm I just took AIARE I and thought that would help in the chance myself or my companions were to be buried, but those photos are a bit eye opening.
Even if there were 5 companions carrying probes and shovels I don't think they'd be able to get to anyone buried that deep in time to save them...
I agree with this. I recall when I took avalanche training in the pre-AIARE days that our instructor shared an anecdote: The dude who wrote either Snow Sense or The ABC's avalanche book (can't remember which one) had his class analyze a slope for most of a day, then it was pronounced probably safe for travel. That same day it slid. Not sure if that's true or an urban myth, but when delivered in class it was a bit jarring.Jorts wrote: ↑Fri Feb 05, 2021 9:38 am True avalanche experts understand the law of averages. And the destructive power of avalanches. They realize that even if they could ski a slope 999 times out of 1000 without it sliding, that is not sufficient for reaching old age while skiing 100+ backcountry days every winter. They are not lulled into complacency and overconfidence by positive feedback loops. And they realize they cannot outsmart the snowpack and terrain so they leave wider margins knowing their snowpack assessments lack 100% certainty. Even with justified confidence that a slope will not slide, they still consider what layer would fail, how deeply it would break, and what terrain traps exist if it did.