Colorado LiDAR Findings

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
BillMiddlebrook
Site Administrator
Posts: 6916
Joined: 7/25/2004
14ers: 58  46  19 
13ers: 172 44 37
Trip Reports (2)
 
Contact:

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by BillMiddlebrook »

This is awesome work!

I’m a bit skeptical of Peak 8 since there’s an 8 foot weather station at the highest point. If it is a 13er, it’s one I’ve summited over 100 times. Lol
"When I go out, I become more alive. I just love skiing. The gravitational pull. When you ski steep terrain... you can almost get a feeling of flying." -Doug Coombs
User avatar
bdloftin77
Posts: 1090
Joined: 9/23/2013
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 58
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by bdloftin77 »

Lidar coverage: Here's the possible game-changing 13,000'+ ones we're waiting on for the 13er+ list.

Sometime soon I'll be looking at the lowest available 13ers to make sure none are demoted to 12ers.

Though the list will be much more solidified after these are available, there might still be some P>320' peaks that could be demoted (or P<280' peaks that could be promoted). Eventually the peaks just falling short of soft-ranked status will be looked at as well, just to make sure there aren't any big surprises. I don't think we have a comprehensive list of, say, Colorado peaks with prominence between 240-280' (I do think John tried to find all the existing soft-ranked peaks in CO). So there could still be some peaks hiding that might not make it through. But the list will be much more accurate than otherwise.
No Lidar Coverage
No Lidar Coverage
NoLidarAvailable.jpg (51.36 KiB) Viewed 1572 times
User avatar
bdloftin77
Posts: 1090
Joined: 9/23/2013
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 58
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by bdloftin77 »

BillMiddlebrook wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:09 pm This is awesome work!

I’m a bit skeptical of Peak 8 since there’s an 8 foot weather station at the highest point. If it is a 13er, it’s one I’ve summited over 100 times. Lol
I can double-check Peak 8 to make sure the weather station wasn't included in the elevation. Thanks!
User avatar
Jon Frohlich
Posts: 2610
Joined: 10/14/2005
14ers: 58 
13ers: 162 3
Trip Reports (29)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Jon Frohlich »

bdloftin77 wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:16 pm
BillMiddlebrook wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:09 pm This is awesome work!

I’m a bit skeptical of Peak 8 since there’s an 8 foot weather station at the highest point. If it is a 13er, it’s one I’ve summited over 100 times. Lol
I can double-check Peak 8 to make sure the weather station wasn't included in the elevation. Thanks!
It looks the one on the Lidar results page is Peak Eight in the San Juans?
User avatar
BillMiddlebrook
Site Administrator
Posts: 6916
Joined: 7/25/2004
14ers: 58  46  19 
13ers: 172 44 37
Trip Reports (2)
 
Contact:

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by BillMiddlebrook »

Jon Frohlich wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:38 pm
bdloftin77 wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:16 pm
BillMiddlebrook wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:09 pm This is awesome work!

I’m a bit skeptical of Peak 8 since there’s an 8 foot weather station at the highest point. If it is a 13er, it’s one I’ve summited over 100 times. Lol
I can double-check Peak 8 to make sure the weather station wasn't included in the elevation. Thanks!
It looks the one on the Lidar results page is Peak Eight in the San Juans?
I was referring to Peak 8 in Summit County, part of the Breckenridge ski area. Looks like it jumped from 12987 to 13005
"When I go out, I become more alive. I just love skiing. The gravitational pull. When you ski steep terrain... you can almost get a feeling of flying." -Doug Coombs
User avatar
Tornadoman
Posts: 1438
Joined: 7/30/2007
14ers: 58  8 
13ers: 266 35
Trip Reports (12)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Tornadoman »

A random 'bump' that might be worth checking just in case is the 13,299 Point near 13,317 in the Sawatch (St. Elmo/Mt. Princeton area roughly). It shows a saddle of 13,000 to 13,040 (average 13,020), thus an estimated prominence of 279'. Probably won't make the cut, but it would seem there is at least a chance.
Climb the mountain so you can see the world, not so the world can see you.
User avatar
Chicago Transplant
Posts: 4012
Joined: 9/7/2004
14ers: 58  12  24 
13ers: 697 39 34
Trip Reports (66)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Chicago Transplant »

Tornadoman wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 6:41 pm A random 'bump' that might be worth checking just in case is the 13,299 Point near 13,317 in the Sawatch (St. Elmo/Mt. Princeton area roughly). It shows a saddle of 13,000 to 13,040 (average 13,020), thus an estimated prominence of 279'. Probably won't make the cut, but it would seem there is at least a chance.
Good call, that was a heartbreaking reclimb. Would be awesome if that turned out to be a 3 13er day.
"We want the unpopular challenge. We want to test our intellect!" - Snapcase
"You are not what you own" - Fugazi
"Life's a mountain not a beach" - Fortune Cookie I got at lunch the other day
User avatar
cottonmountaineering
Posts: 849
Joined: 5/11/2018
14ers: 58  7  18 
13ers: 180 39 31
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by cottonmountaineering »

way cool, looks like ill have a few mountains to do to refinish the bicentennials :-D
Dobsons
Posts: 108
Joined: 4/5/2007
14ers: 58  6 
13ers: 317 1 11
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Dobsons »

So it looks like we are net +1 13er after all this. We would still expect maybe a few more demotions from maybe one or two of the lowest 13ers being lowered and final analysis of the borderline peaks once LiDaR is available on the remaining fringe peaks.

Looks like the recap as of now on 13ers changes goes like this -
Replacement - 13510 concedes rank to Telluride
Demoted - Lightning Pyramid, Lenawee, Wood, 13401, Rhoda, Peak Twelve, Milwaukee, Window, 13123, Loma Lisa Mountain, and Cinnamon mountain (11 peaks total)
Promoted - Kendall No2 Benchmark, 13545, Peak Ten, Ellingwood Ridge, Peak Eight (weminuche), 13472, 13555, and 5 12ers were promoted 12990, peak 8 (breck), 12977, Peak R, and Overlook point (12 peaks total)

Anything I'm missing outside of those?

Really curious to see if Dallas will remain a centennial and it looks like the Bicent list is nearly able to be dialed in as well now that there is likely no more subtractions or additions to the top 200 (pending what happens with Challenger).

Sorry for my ignorance but I'm curious as to where this all goes from here. Obviously John and Bill can eventually update the lists associated with their sites but when would we expect these new elevations etc to show up on future maps? Is there a governing body that makes these changes and updates map elevations etc?
Thanks in advance for any explanation.
Again thanks for the work you guys have been doing! I have been looking forward to reviewing the list almost daily now for a while!
Corey
User avatar
bdloftin77
Posts: 1090
Joined: 9/23/2013
14ers: 58  1 
13ers: 58
Trip Reports (2)
 

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by bdloftin77 »

BillMiddlebrook wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:42 pm
Jon Frohlich wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:38 pm
bdloftin77 wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:16 pm

I can double-check Peak 8 to make sure the weather station wasn't included in the elevation. Thanks!
It looks the one on the Lidar results page is Peak Eight in the San Juans?
I was referring to Peak 8 in Summit County, part of the Breckenridge ski area. Looks like it jumped from 12987 to 13005
Looks like it's definitely above 13,000 feet. Everything that is not gray is above the 13k ft level. This is using class 2/ground only below. I'm confident in saying that it's at least at 13,104', if not the original 13,105'. Lidar didn't seem to pick up the small radio tower much. There were a couple points that did filter out. But putting the high point's coordinates into google earth, the tower appeared to be slightly NE of the high point location that lidar picked up (but within 10-15 ft). The high point below is the lowest of the three dark blue dots.

The first imagery is from 10/2015. I see a structure/shadow 15 ft NE of the high point. I believe this is the 8 ft tall radio tower (B).

The second imagery is from 9/2019. I see the same structure/shadow (B), and something else a bit closer (8-9 feet away - A). Not sure what that is. But looks like neither conflicts with the high point's elevation, even if the ground class only still managed to pick up unnatural materials.
Peak 8 Lidar
Peak 8 Lidar
Peak_8.png (223.44 KiB) Viewed 1366 times
Peak 8 Tower in 10/2015 Imagery
Peak 8 Tower in 10/2015 Imagery
Peak 8 Summit 10-2015.png (794.52 KiB) Viewed 1366 times
Peak 8 Tower and Unknown Object 9/2019 Imagery
Peak 8 Tower and Unknown Object 9/2019 Imagery
Peak 8 Summit 9-2019.png (917.4 KiB) Viewed 1366 times
User avatar
Eli Boardman
Posts: 660
Joined: 6/23/2016
14ers: 58  1  15 
13ers: 18 1
Trip Reports (16)
 
Contact:

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by Eli Boardman »

So how does this work with things like FKTs? For instance, the FKT on the centennials would presumably now include a different set of peaks. So, first person to beat the current time (established on the old list) while climbing the new peaks instead? It probably doesn't make much difference in this case, but it's interesting how peak additions/substitutions could potentially alter the character of an established FKT on a hypothetical list.

Further, what is the precedent for handling other types of records, i.e. first winter completion of a given list? Again, not sure if it's directly relevant to the lists in question, but I'm curious how it would work if someone's existing claim was repeated either slower/later on the "correct" peaks, assuming an existing record was completed partially on the "wrong" peaks. I'm sure the FKT community must have a precedent for this sort of situation, right?
User avatar
BillMiddlebrook
Site Administrator
Posts: 6916
Joined: 7/25/2004
14ers: 58  46  19 
13ers: 172 44 37
Trip Reports (2)
 
Contact:

Re: Colorado LiDAR Findings

Post by BillMiddlebrook »

bdloftin77 wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 9:09 pm
BillMiddlebrook wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:42 pm
Jon Frohlich wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:38 pm

It looks the one on the Lidar results page is Peak Eight in the San Juans?
I was referring to Peak 8 in Summit County, part of the Breckenridge ski area. Looks like it jumped from 12987 to 13005
Looks like it's definitely above 13,000 feet. Everything that is not gray is above the 13k ft level. This is using class 2/ground only below. I'm confident in saying that it's at least at 13,104', if not the original 13,105'. Lidar didn't seem to pick up the small radio tower much. There were a couple points that did filter out. But putting the high point's coordinates into google earth, the tower appeared to be slightly NE of the high point location that lidar picked up (but within 10-15 ft). The high point below is the lowest of the three dark blue dots.

The first imagery is from 10/2015. I see a structure/shadow 15 ft NE of the high point. I believe this is the 8 ft tall radio tower (B).

The second imagery is from 9/2019. I see the same structure/shadow (B), and something else a bit closer (8-9 feet away - A). Not sure what that is. But looks like neither conflicts with the high point's elevation, even if the ground class only still managed to pick up unnatural materials.
Excellent

In the 2nd photo, that is probably a ski patrol sled. Sometimes they leave one on the summit (secured and bottom-side up) for easier access injured skiers.

In all likelihood Peak 8 is now the busiest calendar winter 13er!!
"When I go out, I become more alive. I just love skiing. The gravitational pull. When you ski steep terrain... you can almost get a feeling of flying." -Doug Coombs
Post Reply