Sawtooth vs Kelso

Colorado peak questions, condition requests and other info.
Forum rules
  • This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
  • Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
  • Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
  • Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
    For more details, please see the Terms of Use you agreed to when joining the forum.
User avatar
YooperJonKornely
Posts: 137
Joined: 6/21/2009
14ers: 36  2 
Trip Reports (0)
 

Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by YooperJonKornely »

I had a question regarding the Sawtooth versus Kelso Ridge, and the 'length' of the Class 3 section. I've read a bunch of trip reports on each, but my question is how long is the actual "scary" part on each? (I know 'scary' is relative... but just play along). It appears that the Sawtooth Ridge has a fairly short section that is the crux, the rest (Accent up Bierstadt/Decent down Evans) is similar to many other easier 14ers. But how much Class 3 is on Kelso? Are there just sections like the knife edge towards the top, or is a majority of the route Class 3? I'm just trying to get an idea of which would be best for me to attempt first, and get some beta on which of these has the most/longest Class 3 exposure.
User avatar
I Man
Posts: 1028
Joined: 7/18/2011
14ers: 58  49 
13ers: 74 7
Trip Reports (30)
 
Contact:

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by I Man »

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38905

I am of the opinion that any Class 3 route that has a Class 2 descent (which both of these do) - is a good first Class 3. I have not done Kelso Ridge, but I find Sawtooth to be very easy for Class 3.
Last edited by I Man on Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
You can touch the void, just don't fall into it.

I fly a starship across the universe divide....and when I reach the other side...I'll find a place to rest my spirit if I can. Perhaps I may become a Mountain Man again.
User avatar
Brian C
Posts: 1308
Joined: 2/26/2008
14ers: 45  5 
13ers: 19
Trip Reports (25)
 
Contact:

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by Brian C »

This is something that people always argue about and everybody takes it differently. For what it's worth, I did Sawtooth as my very first scramble and was not scared at all. I did Kelso Ridge as my third scramble (after Longs Peak) and was scared to death. Granted we were a bit off route on Kelso on loose junk on the side of the ridge and right on track on the Sawtooth.
Brian in the Wild
Lists of John
"Nature never did betray the heart that loved her." - Wordsworth
User avatar
Somewhat of a Prick
Posts: 745
Joined: 8/4/2012
14ers: 58  7 
13ers: 84
Trip Reports (17)
 

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by Somewhat of a Prick »

Kelso is more difficult
User avatar
wildlobo71
Posts: 2080
Joined: 4/1/2008
14ers: 58  5 
13ers: 88
Trip Reports (3)
 
Contact:

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by wildlobo71 »

I see the Sawtooth as this: It's got some high class 2 on both the descent and ascent, and areas on the actual ridge-proper that you can make class 3 - exposures, etc... The only class-3 work is the upclimb from the saddle to the ramp on the ascent up. That exit ramp spooks some people - loose scree on it, it's pitched to the west where the exposure is. All in all it's fun, but you can pick a safer, more stable line of passage, east of the ridge for your liking pretty much the entire point from dropping off Bierstadt (until you get to the climb up to the ramp - that, you have to do if you don't want to turn around and return to Bierstadt.)

Kelso is really fun, the exposure isn't too dramatic, but once you get past the saddle and start the ridge proper, you don't really have many options to pick better, safer, less sketchy (for your tastes) lines... the ridge is the path, and that fact also spooks some people - fewer areas to bail off in case you can't handle it. Kelso is more sustained at a light- to typical Class 3 route from the saddle up to the summit.

Sawtooth is less technical in my opinion.
Last edited by wildlobo71 on Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Bill W.

Time for the next great losing streak to begin.
#forcedrefocus
User avatar
Ramfan24
Posts: 112
Joined: 7/23/2009
14ers: 30  1 
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by Ramfan24 »

The Sawtooth was my first class 3. Other than the sideways slanting of the ramp, I didn't find it particularly difficult or scary. I thought Kelso was a lot more fun and a little bit spicier. Both are short enough that they make good early class 3 experiences.
User avatar
jaymz
Posts: 1035
Joined: 6/6/2006
Trip Reports (1)
 

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by jaymz »

Comparing these two routes is difficult, because they're so different.
1. Kelso is sustained class 3 with a short approach and an easy stroll on the way back to the TH from the Grays/Torreys saddle.
2. The Sawtooth is a short section of class 3 followed by mainly class 2 surrounded by somewhat dramatic exposure, sandwiched between a long, high approach and a slog on the way back to the TH (assuming you're coming from Guanella).
It's interesting to see that some find Kelso to be harder/scarier - it just depends on whom you ask, I suppose.
The Sawtooth's class 3 sections aren't that technical or difficult, and really not that sustained. The scariest part for me was the seemingly loose rock just before exiting the Sawtooth, at the section circled in the pic below (forgive the poor quality). The rock is much more solid than it looks up close, but until I actually got on it I was afraid I was going to slide right off that cliff.
Kelso, on the other hand, never had me feeling like I was going to fall off. But the class 3 is pretty sustained the whole way along that ridge.
These were my first two class 3 routes, done about a month apart with the Sawtooth first. Perhaps I'd have been more scared of Kelso had I done it first, but if I had to pick only one of these routes to do for the rest of my life, it'd be Kelso in a heartbeat.
Attachments
Sawtooth.jpg
Sawtooth.jpg (84.08 KiB) Viewed 663 times
"But in every walk with Nature, one receives far more than he seeks."
John Muir
User avatar
Steve Climber
Posts: 873
Joined: 12/31/2007
14ers: 27  3 
13ers: 30
Trip Reports (11)
 

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by Steve Climber »

I think the difficulty of the Sawtooth is a bit over stated. At no point, have I ever felt nervous crossing it....It would be a different story in wet conditions-but dry- it's quite straight forward and much easier that it looks.

Kelso is a bit more taxing as it is pretty well sustained Class 3 and if you get slightly off route (like we did) it can get quite spicy.

There are only a few small spots (exit ramp of Sawtooth and Knife edge on Kelso) that you really need to take care on. Both are fantastic routes though. Be warned when you walk up to the top of Evans and someone in a mini-van asks you where you came from...when you point at Bierstadt, they will think you are super human. I'm in somebody's vacation photos as "that crazy mountain man" LOL :-s
Dave B wrote:And/or line thy helmet with tin foil and realize this is a freaking mountaineering website.
Steve Climber wrote:So that's your backpack, huh?
OrthoMatt
Posts: 12
Joined: 12/12/2011
14ers: 58  6 
13ers: 1
Trip Reports (0)
 

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by OrthoMatt »

It's hard to add anything that hasn't already been said, but I can give my opinion...

I first did the Sawtooth as part of Roaches' Tour de Abyss and really only remember there being one spot with any real exposure - the exit ramp. It really isn't bad and doesn't make you feel too uncomfortable, however I do remember it being a little loose. There was less Class III on the Sawtooth compared to Kelso so you might consider doing this route first.

Kelso Ridge was a lot more fun/enjoyable to me (hence why I have done it 4 times and the Sawtooth only once). It is Class II hiking with a few Class III spots to keep you interested. The exposure on Kelso was less from my recollection than the Sawtooth but I thought it was more technical.

I know a lot of people would think I am reckless for having done this, but I have taken several people for their first 14ers on these routes with one of them being my 55yo father. They were in shape and I judged them to be competent at the time. I share that only to suggest that they aren't as bad as some may say, but you'll have to judge your own comfort level. Be safe and have fun!
User avatar
GregMiller
Posts: 1001
Joined: 6/16/2011
14ers: 37  4  1 
13ers: 30
Trip Reports (5)
 

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by GregMiller »

I actually did Kelso for my first 14er (if I'd known what I was getting into, I would have, but I was drug up by some friends of mine). I actually greatly enjoyed it. I did Sawtooth something around my 10th or 12th, and enjoyed it as well, but never felt as exposed as I did on Kelso (I mean, I don't think anything on the Sawtooth relaly matches the exposure on both sides of the knife edge, but that's me).

As far as the exit ramp goes, there's a ledge up to climber's right that makes it a lot easier. After you cross over, at the bottom, when you're looking up at the exit ramp thinking "holy cow", turn right to face uphill. Scramble up to the ledge, and follow that all the way along. You skip past most (if not all) of the scree, with a good wall to hang on to, on a solid trail.

Personally, as far as 'fun' goes, I actually like the Sawtooth, by way of Roach's Tour d'Abyss. You can take the class 2 sections before you cross over and turn them into Class 3 or 4. Kelso, as far as I've been able to tell, doesn't give you many options.
Still Here
been scared and battered. My hopes the wind done scattered. Snow has friz me, Sun has baked me,
Looks like between 'em they done Tried to make me
Stop laughin', stop lovin', stop livin'-- But I don't care! I'm still here!
Langston Hughes
User avatar
SurfNTurf
Posts: 1890
Joined: 8/20/2009
14ers: 58  28 
13ers: 127 7
Trip Reports (48)
 
Contact:

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by SurfNTurf »

Sawtooth is barely Class 3, but perhaps more unnerving on the exposed scree ledges. Far less aesthetic of a line. You might run into people trying to pretend they're search and rescue (but for dogs) with no regard for that pesky "months of intense training" thing.

Kelso Ridge is a flat-out classic. Sustained Class 3 with a few Class 2 areas for mental breaks. The Knife Edge is short and not as exposed as its name would suggest. Once on the summit, college girls in running shorts will fawn over you.

Kelso Ridge wins.

EDIT: to answer the OP's question more directly, Kelso Ridge was my first Class 3 and somewhere around my fifth 14er. I had no issue, even though it was my first taste of exposure. At the time I was still afraid of single-pitch sport routes, so it's not like I had balls of steel. It was a blast. I did the Sawtooth much later in my 14er journey, but if I'd done it earlier I think the scree ledges would have given me pause. Kelso Ridge, in my opinion, is more fun and less scary.
“There are two kinds of climbers: those who climb because their heart sings when they’re in the mountains, and all the rest.” - Alex Lowe

"There have been joys too great to describe in words, and there have been griefs upon which I cannot dare to dwell; and with those in mind I say, 'Climb if you will, but remember that courage and strength are nought without prudence, and that a momentary negligence may destroy the happiness of a lifetime. Do nothing in haste, look well to each step, and from the beginning think what may be the end.'" - Edward Whymper
User avatar
Jay521
Posts: 1160
Joined: 8/1/2007
14ers: 42  10 
13ers: 175 22
Trip Reports (56)
 

Re: Sawtooth vs Kelso

Post by Jay521 »

SurfNTurf wrote:Once on the summit, college girls in running shorts will fawn over you.
Kelso Ridge wins.
'nuff said!'
I take the mountain climber's approach to housekeeping - don't look down
Post Reply