Forum
Buying gear? Please use these links to help 14ers.com:

More info...

Other ways to help...

avy danger on Missouri standard route

Colorado 14er peak questions and conditions should be posted here. 14er Trip Reports
Posts: 8
Joined: 04 Jan 2012, 09:14

avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby happymtnclimber » 24 Jan 2013, 20:20

any one been up there or have any thoughts?

User avatar
Posts: 185
Joined: 07 Jul 2011, 19:18
Location: Erie, CO

Re: avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby awilbur77 » 24 Jan 2013, 20:51

Normally it has a stretch of significant avy danger getting to the ridge. This year, I would be surprised if there's even enough snow to warrant that concern, but the new storms starting tonight may change that.

User avatar
Posts: 1170
Joined: 10 May 2008, 19:43
Location: Estes Park

Re: avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby Kiefer » 24 Jan 2013, 21:00

A few years ago, I went up in the late fall. Lower down on the slope, I was setting off some deep fractures. Nothing slid but it was 'rather uncomfortable.' I contoured left to the rock ribs and started to poke around. I hadn't really meant to, but I ended up climbing these ribs to the ridge.
It worked well enough in getting to the top but the rock was pretty chossy & loose. Probably something I wouldn't do again.
If yer not sure about the standard route, take the west slopes from Chlosey Lake. It's tons safer in winter. Not sure about the mileage but I believe it's fairly comparable.

Plus it gives you the added advantage of getting Iowa & Emerald!
"Mama, mama many worlds I've come, since I first, left home."
-J. Garcia

User avatar
Posts: 1256
Joined: 02 May 2007, 21:06
Location: Denver

Re: avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby Papillon » 24 Jan 2013, 21:11

January 9

Image

Sorry I don't have anything down lower. You can see the standard route gaining the ridge above. A couple spots look like they could be interesting but they might be nothing (think alpine perspective).

The Rockdale approach (Clohesy Lake) that Kiefer recommends is pretty slick. Miles and vert are comparable. TH is about two miles further down CR 390, parking for maybe one or two vehicles, a couple of cabins mark the turnoff.

Good luck.
The look in his eyes when it hit - Kid, it was tasty... - William Seward Burroughs

User avatar
Posts: 1065
Joined: 17 Oct 2006, 14:33
Location: PUEBLO

Re: avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby sgladbach » 25 Jan 2013, 11:41

Papillon wrote:The Rockdale approach (Clohesy Lake) that Kiefer recommends is pretty slick. Miles and vert are comparable. TH is about two miles further down CR 390, parking for maybe one or two vehicles, a couple of cabins mark the turnoff.

Good luck.


Currently, the TH is approachable in most any vehicle and the route is semi-broken. (The track is a couple weeks old, but easier to follow than if it had never been broken.)
"We knocked the bastard off." Hillary, 1953
"It is not the mountain we conquer but ourselves." Hillary, 2003
Couldn't we all use 50 years of humble growth?

User avatar
Posts: 466
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 16:38
Location: Boulder

Re: avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby I Man » 25 Jan 2013, 11:43

If you gain the ridge earlier on the standard route you avoid the danger. This adds some vert though and is a long ridge run both ways.

http://14ers.com/php14ers/tripreport.php?trip=11360&parmpeak=Missouri+Mountain&start=15&cpgm=tripmain&ski=Include (See picture #9)

as always, you must evaluate specific conditions as you find them.

The route from Rockdale is a fun one as well.
You can touch the void, just don't fall into it.

"I fly a starship across the universe divide....and when I reach the other side...I'll find a place to rest my spirit if I can. Perhaps I may become a Mountain Man again.

User avatar
Posts: 1256
Joined: 02 May 2007, 21:06
Location: Denver

Re: avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby Papillon » 25 Jan 2013, 11:57

A couple of things from our ascent of Missouri via Rockdale on January 5 (if anyone chooses to go this route):

1. The talus leading to the ridge was tedious down low. Snow on the rocks made each step an uncertainty (sink to knee or thigh, wobble, etc.). We all agreed we would not want to descend this stuff in the dark.

2. Snow along the ridge to the summit was starting to get interesting in one spot. We had to downclimb about 30-40 feet to avoid the snow and then sidehill on scree for a bit. A little more snow and a little more wind since then might make it more interesting (I'd like to see what it looks like in late spring).

3. Steve put a nice trench in to just above the lake. Jamie improved it the morning of our ascent, and then our group cut it left to the talus.

Overall, I was glad to have taken this route. Nothing like visiting a new drainage (and avoiding that 1600 foot grunt to the cabin right out of the gate in Missouri Gulch).
The look in his eyes when it hit - Kid, it was tasty... - William Seward Burroughs

User avatar
Posts: 605
Joined: 06 Sep 2008, 10:09
Location: Boulder Colorado

Re: avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby kimo » 25 Jan 2013, 13:06

I haven't been up the standard but I will give another hearty recommendation for the Chlosey/Rockdale west ridge route.

Papillon wrote:2. Snow along the ridge to the summit was starting to get interesting in one spot. We had to downclimb about 30-40 feet to avoid the snow and then sidehill on scree for a bit. A little more snow and a little more wind since then might make it more interesting (I'd like to see what it looks like in late spring).


Not sure this spring will look anything like spring 2011 but here we are heading down on the west side of the summit ridge. That was memorable.

Image

User avatar
Posts: 1956
Joined: 25 Sep 2009, 20:47
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: avy danger on Missouri standard route

Postby Dancesatmoonrise » 25 Jan 2013, 13:15

Excellent post, Kevin. Great shot, Kimo!
Hopefully I can add something helpful regarding the east side approach.

I can't speak to the west side approach except to say that this is the way I had originally planned to go, but ended up taking a variation of the standard route: once in November 2010, and once in January 2012. (There are trip reports for each.)

I suspect the section of the ridge seen below is usually dry in winter. The completely dry part (to the right) is somewhat loose, but the two ribs to the left have afforded reasonable, low-angle winter travel.



Here's what it looked like in November 2010:

Image


Here's what it looked like last January:

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ahrendse, anasarca76, bloomy, DrewR, eskermo, James Scott, jeremycu, macgyver, mkrier, seano732, Tim A, user3377, WarDamnPanic and 17 guests