- Posts: 390
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:02 pm
- Location: K-town (near the Smokies)
I've heard about the north ridge route on Kit Carson for a while, and have been interested in trying it. After having done the Crestones traverse last weekend, I found the upper half of the summit crux pitch up the Needle to be a bit more intense than I was expecting--for a 4th class route, it seemed to have pretty small and difficult holds for a few dozen feet. I was wondering if anyone who's done both routes could compare this section to the toughest parts of KC's route, or even the overall difficulties of both routes. Thanks in advance!
"If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them down? We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason."
— Jack HandyMah peaks
- Posts: 2387
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:16 am
- Location: Scottsdale, AZ
The up-climb on the final stretch to the Needle (when doing the traverse from the Peak) is comparable to the N ridge on Kit, imo.
The N ridge route is probably more sustained, exposed scrambling, but slightly less of an angle than the crux pitch on the Needle.
The N ridge is also equal in rock quality.
Edited for additional comment.
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:55 pm
I agree with Darin's assessment. Spot on.
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:32 am
- Location: Montrose
The N Ridge of KC is easier and way more fun!
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:19 am
- Location: Colorado Springs
Thanks, guys. I actually had the same question, and came upon this thread. I might try the N Ridge of Kit Carson for practice before I attempt the Crestones traverse.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ajf1126, ajkagy, AlexeyD, bdloftin77, beburke30, Cesarbg17, chicagostylehotdog, eyost11, gb, Headwall5, JROSKA, KatieFinn, khuff5280, PaliKona, polar, Rollie Free, tarnelope, tnewbrough, Tory Wells, vandy, WhatWasIThinking, wishiwasalazycat and 85 guests