- IMGP5700-4.JPG (341.73 KiB) Viewed 5677 times
Sunrise or Sunset
Forum rules
- This is a mountaineering forum, so please keep your posts on-topic. Posts do not all have to be related to the 14ers but should at least be mountaineering-related.
- Personal attacks and confrontational behavior will result in removal from the forum at the discretion of the administrators.
- Do not use this forum to advertise, sell photos or other products or promote a commercial website.
- Posts will be removed at the discretion of the site administrator or moderator(s), including: Troll posts, posts pushing political views or religious beliefs, and posts with the purpose of instigating conflict within the forum.
- Mark Curtis
- Posts: 648
- Joined: 7/27/2004
- Trip Reports (0)
- Contact:
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
http://www.flickr.com/photos/46092977@N07/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- mattpayne11
- Posts: 992
- Joined: 5/9/2009
- 14ers: 58
- 13ers: 111
- Trip Reports (48)
- Contact:
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
I really like HDR, and I know that they are blown-out - it is on purpose. Its my application of creativity. Some people really like it, others really don't. To each their own I guess.djkest wrote:I like the composition of these shots but to me HDR is a big turn-off with the fake blown-out colors. Might you have these less altered?mattpayne11 wrote:Here's a few I've done this summer:
Sunset over Shavano - HDR
Sunrise over Uncompahgre - HDR Panoramic
Sunrise over Uncompahgre - HDR
Sunrise over Stewart Creek
Sunrise from Princeton
With that being said - I am trying hard to adapt to a less HDR-y look, it is just really hard to do. The weather needs to cooperate with me haha.
Mark - thank you for the kind words! the standard shots from those photos are boring. The lighting of those shots is in such a way that either the sky would be overblown or the mountain would be dark. I'll post a few in a minute to show you the difference! The Princeton one is not HDR - by the way.
- Mark Curtis
- Posts: 648
- Joined: 7/27/2004
- Trip Reports (0)
- Contact:
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
Yeah, no problem. I hope it didn't seem like I was speaking for you in a defensive way.....I knew you would handle it well. I just wanted to share my view on your work. I would definitely like to see the regular versions of your photos.....maybe it will illustrate to detractors exactly why you are choosing the HDR method for these shots where the dynamic range is so difficult to reign in.mattpayne11 wrote:
Mark - thank you for the kind words! the standard shots from those photos are boring. The lighting of those shots is in such a way that either the sky would be overblown or the mountain would be dark. I'll post a few in a minute to show you the difference!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/46092977@N07/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Dancesatmoonrise
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: 9/25/2009
- 14ers: 58 43
- 13ers: 1
- Trip Reports (68)
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
Mark Curtis wrote:Yeah, no problem. I hope it didn't seem like I was speaking for you in a defensive way.....I knew you would handle it well. I just wanted to share my view on your work. I would definitely like to see the regular versions of your photos.....maybe it will illustrate to detractors exactly why you are choosing the HDR method for these shots where the dynamic range is so difficult to reign in.mattpayne11 wrote:
Mark - thank you for the kind words! the standard shots from those photos are boring. The lighting of those shots is in such a way that either the sky would be overblown or the mountain would be dark. I'll post a few in a minute to show you the difference!
Matt, take that Sunrise over Uncompahgre, and try cropping the sky down to the clouds. I'll bet that will create a much more powerful composition.
Just my 2c, of course.
Jim
- mattpayne11
- Posts: 992
- Joined: 5/9/2009
- 14ers: 58
- 13ers: 111
- Trip Reports (48)
- Contact:
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
Jim - I'll give it a shot... and I'll upload the non-HDR versions.Dancesatmoonrise wrote:Mark Curtis wrote:Yeah, no problem. I hope it didn't seem like I was speaking for you in a defensive way.....I knew you would handle it well. I just wanted to share my view on your work. I would definitely like to see the regular versions of your photos.....maybe it will illustrate to detractors exactly why you are choosing the HDR method for these shots where the dynamic range is so difficult to reign in.mattpayne11 wrote:
Mark - thank you for the kind words! the standard shots from those photos are boring. The lighting of those shots is in such a way that either the sky would be overblown or the mountain would be dark. I'll post a few in a minute to show you the difference!
Matt, take that Sunrise over Uncompahgre, and try cropping the sky down to the clouds. I'll bet that will create a much more powerful composition.
Just my 2c, of course.
Jim
Mark - no worries man! You're right - I need to do that!
Here's the files that HDR is based on. While they are not "bad" photos - you can see how capturing the full range of light would be impossible without HDR. Plus, I think the HDR treatment adds a unique and "epic" feel to it.
- mattpayne11
- Posts: 992
- Joined: 5/9/2009
- 14ers: 58
- 13ers: 111
- Trip Reports (48)
- Contact:
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
And Jim - I think you might be right - here's the cropped version:
- Dancesatmoonrise
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: 9/25/2009
- 14ers: 58 43
- 13ers: 1
- Trip Reports (68)
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
Matt, play with it a bit. If it were my image, I'd try cropping even further - right down to the clouds. Not sure how it will look, but I'd try it. Then I might also look at cropping in from the left a little to get the sun more on the 1/3 power point.
Cropping is so simple, but really is an incredible compositional tool. It's also something I do last.
Edit:
Just playing around with the low-res images, this is a rough mock-up of what I was thinking-
Cropping is so simple, but really is an incredible compositional tool. It's also something I do last.
Edit:
Just playing around with the low-res images, this is a rough mock-up of what I was thinking-
Last edited by Dancesatmoonrise on Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- The_Godfather
- Posts: 111
- Joined: 5/23/2011
- 14ers: 18
- 13ers: 1
- Trip Reports (0)
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
good instance of doing things different...i crop first so that the "scrap" doesn't affect the composition of any details done to the final image. either way works, neither is "required"Dancesatmoonrise wrote:Matt, play with it a bit. If it were my image, I'd try cropping even further - right down to the clouds. Not sure how it will look, but I'd try it. Then I might also look at cropping in from the left a little to get the sun more on the 1/3 power point.
Cropping is so simple, but really is an incredible compositional tool. It's also something I do last.
- Dancesatmoonrise
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: 9/25/2009
- 14ers: 58 43
- 13ers: 1
- Trip Reports (68)
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
The problem with cropping first is, once you have more or less what you want, you may find that you want to "move" or nudge key compositional elements - then it's too late to add image anywhere. It's bit me a few times, so I will even zoom in and process that way, knowing I'm ultimately going to have maybe a tight crop, but get the adjustments done first. Then save as a main version with the entire scene - This way, nothing is destroyed. When cropping first and adjusting afterward, the cropped portion of the image is lost forever - unless you know exactly which values were used on the adjustments for the rest of it.The_Godfather wrote:good instance of doing things different...i crop first so that the "scrap" doesn't affect the composition of any details done to the final image. either way works, neither is "required"Dancesatmoonrise wrote:Matt, play with it a bit. If it were my image, I'd try cropping even further - right down to the clouds. Not sure how it will look, but I'd try it. Then I might also look at cropping in from the left a little to get the sun more on the 1/3 power point.
Cropping is so simple, but really is an incredible compositional tool. It's also something I do last.
Anyway, it's just what I've found to work best after processing several thousand images. I hate having to do one twice.
- mattpayne11
- Posts: 992
- Joined: 5/9/2009
- 14ers: 58
- 13ers: 111
- Trip Reports (48)
- Contact:
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
If you use Lightroom (like me), the original photo is never destroyed, and you can always go back to previous steps at anytime. It really is awesome.Dancesatmoonrise wrote:The problem with cropping first is, once you have more or less what you want, you may find that you want to "move" or nudge key compositional elements - then it's too late to add image anywhere. It's bit me a few times, so I will even zoom in and process that way, knowing I'm ultimately going to have maybe a tight crop, but get the adjustments done first. Then save as a main version with the entire scene - This way, nothing is destroyed. When cropping first and adjusting afterward, the cropped portion of the image is lost forever - unless you know exactly which values were used on the adjustments for the rest of it.The_Godfather wrote:good instance of doing things different...i crop first so that the "scrap" doesn't affect the composition of any details done to the final image. either way works, neither is "required"Dancesatmoonrise wrote:Matt, play with it a bit. If it were my image, I'd try cropping even further - right down to the clouds. Not sure how it will look, but I'd try it. Then I might also look at cropping in from the left a little to get the sun more on the 1/3 power point.
Cropping is so simple, but really is an incredible compositional tool. It's also something I do last.
Anyway, it's just what I've found to work best after processing several thousand images. I hate having to do one twice.
- djkest
- Posts: 1420
- Joined: 9/7/2009
- 14ers: 58
- 13ers: 19
- Trip Reports (44)
- Contact:
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
Matt: I realized my comment was a little insensative since you put so much time and effort into your photography. I probably should have said: Those photos look great butthat I prefer a little less HDR. I wish my own photography was a touch more vibrant though, so I guess I'm jealous in a way. keep up the good work! Also, if you have a normal point and shoot, is there a way to do this or simulate it? Like you said, the thing I like most about HDR is it seems to capture outdoor stuff better, since my photos tend to be too bright and washed out. I use a program called paint.net which is a free photoshop-like tool. Mainly I end up reducing the brightness and increasing the contrast. I also add a touch of sharpness sometimes (not much). I rarely crop them, but I usually decrease the resolution for internet use. (I keep the origional).mattpayne11 wrote:I really like HDR, and I know that they are blown-out - it is on purpose. Its my application of creativity. Some people really like it, others really don't. To each their own I guess.djkest wrote:I like the composition of these shots but to me HDR is a big turn-off with the fake blown-out colors. Might you have these less altered?
With that being said - I am trying hard to adapt to a less HDR-y look, it is just really hard to do. The weather needs to cooperate with me haha.
Mark - thank you for the kind words! the standard shots from those photos are boring. The lighting of those shots is in such a way that either the sky would be overblown or the mountain would be dark. I'll post a few in a minute to show you the difference! The Princeton one is not HDR - by the way.
Life is a mountain, not a beach.
Exploring and Wine, my personal blog
Exploring and Wine, my personal blog
- Dancesatmoonrise
- Posts: 1887
- Joined: 9/25/2009
- 14ers: 58 43
- 13ers: 1
- Trip Reports (68)
Re: Sunrise or Sunset
Same with PS. But in PS, when you lop and crop, then go on to do some really nice adjustments you like after that, while you can certainly go back to the uncropped version, it won't have the same adjustments. I don't know of a way to tack it back on to the finished output and have the tacked on part have the all the adjustments that came after it had been cropped off. If anyone knows how to do this in PS, please let me know.mattpayne11 wrote: If you use Lightroom (like me), the original photo is never destroyed, and you can always go back to previous steps at anytime. It really is awesome.