Just need to fine tune the wording....
Oh, hey, this is my 1,200th post. Nifty.
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:08 pm
- Location: Lincoln, NE
Closer to me in Kansas they had the biggest waste of time "amendment" to gun laws that really wasn't even an amendment on their ballot today. And Rhode Island's state name change--give me a break.
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:10 am
- Location: Congress Park
Michael Bennett actually proposed an amendment that snowboarding be OUTLAWED to those who don't subscribe to federal health care!!!
Oh wait, sorry, the stupid/absurd/idiotic/wasteful commercials have got me thinking everyone is evil.
Almost my 1200th, equally nifty.
- Doug Shaw
- Posts: 2129
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 6:44 am
fleetmack wrote:Oh wait, sorry, the stupid/absurd/idiotic/wasteful commercials have got me thinking everyone is evil.
No sh*t. What I can't decide is whether November 3rd should be made a national day of celebration since the election cycle is over, or a day of mourning because some scoundrel will be in office (regardless of who wins).
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:07 am
- Location: Littleton, CO
You probably could add a 3000' gain clause and hide it within another amendment. That's the trendy way everything gets passed anyway.
Will it be 3000' total (gross/net gain/on the descent/etc)
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:58 pm
- Location: Colorado Springs
Exploring and Wine, my personal blog
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:25 pm
- Location: Broomfield, CO
djkest wrote:I like the 3,000 foot rule but I think there should be some exceptions, mainly Sherman. It seems a little ridiculous to park several miles down the road so that you can comply with an arbitrary rule. I didn't even park at the "upper trailhead", it was full, but we were about 1/4 mile below that. Still not 3,000 feet.
Just do Sherman in the winter. Then you're forced to park down the road. That fixes the problem for Bierstadt too.
FourteenerDan wrote:Am I bad for counting the 3000 rule for the Decalibron because it added up to more than 3000 feet after I climbed all 3 (or is it 4?) summits?
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:49 pm
Bean wrote:The 3,000' rule is moronic. I'd much rather have an amendment defining hiking vs. climbing (i.e. "no, you did not climb Bross, you hiked it.").
+1! This is one of my pet peeves, actually. It irks me like people who don't signal lane changes or people who won't accelerate fast enough in a merge lane. I have many, many traffic peeves, but I'll save them for another thread....
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: adamjm, AlexeyD, beburke30, Chicago Transplant, CHWitte, dwemp6, fahixson, Hobbes301, its_not_a_tuba, Jmbiller, justiner, martinleroux, Newt2, Rollie Free, RosieTheSummiter, sieggy80305, tlongpine, Usher73, vadim4o and 37 guests