Forum
Buying gear? Please use these links to help 14ers.com:

More info...

Other ways to help...

A win for the San Juans

Colorado 14ers access and fee issues only, please
Posts: 102
Joined: 28 Oct 2007, 10:05
Location: Western PA

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby XMULE » 02 Oct 2011, 08:57

Read
Encounters with the Arch Druid
by John McPhee
Se esmera, coracao
E confia
Na forca do amanha

User avatar
Posts: 316
Joined: 23 Sep 2009, 20:33
Location: Southeast CO

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby sevenvii » 02 Oct 2011, 10:13

Very well said Garrett, much to the same point I have been trying to make without your eloquence :)

User avatar
Posts: 1782
Joined: 07 Jan 2007, 21:34
Location: Crested Butte, CO

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby ajkagy » 02 Oct 2011, 10:19

Garrett wrote:Where to start on this. I say leave it open to all use and stop designating land as wilderness here and in other places. Wilderness designation is outdated and just an easy way for the governing agencies to avoid appropriately managing public lands. Why not address individual issues as they present themselves and actually manage public lands as individual user groups present themselves.


well said

I'm surprised the mtn bike community hasn't gotten together 1000 or so riders in protest and ridden a "wilderness" trail...then again the burning issue isn't necessarily with current wilderness, but rather the wilderness nuts taking more and more trails away.
http://www.resortbeta.com - An interactive ski/snowboard experience for all your favorite ski resorts.

User avatar
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 May 2009, 23:23
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby mattpayne11 » 03 Oct 2011, 06:53

Who'd have thought that a Wilderness Designation Act would get so much negative commentary on a forum dedicated to climbing mountains in those areas.

Online
User avatar
Posts: 934
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 21:38
Location: Lakewood CO and Desert Hills AZ

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby Mark A Steiner » 03 Oct 2011, 08:01

That's what forums are for - a medium to express a wide range of opinion among a select group (visitors to the 14ers and 13ers) - at least for now.
Good day.

User avatar
Posts: 251
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 16:54
Location: Erie, CO

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby roguejackalope » 03 Oct 2011, 11:45

mattpayne11 wrote:Who'd have thought that a Wilderness Designation Act would get so much negative commentary on a forum dedicated to climbing mountains in those areas.

I think there might be a silent majority that doesn't lean strongly in one direction or another, and feel they wouldn't add much to the conversation.

For example, I am in favor of adding wilderness protection to areas that have wilderness characteristics, are not currently used by user groups who object to the protections (MTBs and ORVs, etc), and where geography, geology, access, or use make resource exploitation prohibitive or undesirable. Areas should be excluded from wilderness protection when there is a legitimate reason. But I think the more wild we can keep wild the better.

If that convinced everyone, then we can all hold hands and sing "Kumbaya" together.

That said, I think the prohibition against human-powered transport should be changed. A mountain bike is a tool you take with you when you leave, just like a stove or tent. For most trails, they cause less erosion than currently allowed modes of transportation. As in other, non-wilderness areas, they could be permitted or prohibited on specific trails, and it should be up the local forest service to make those determinations, rather than a blanket prohibition based on a weak interpretation of an outdated law. And I don't even mountain bike.
"Hiking is just walking where it's okay to pee" - Demetri Martin

User avatar
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 May 2009, 23:23
Location: Colorado Springs

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby mattpayne11 » 08 Oct 2011, 23:16

roguejackalope wrote:
mattpayne11 wrote:Who'd have thought that a Wilderness Designation Act would get so much negative commentary on a forum dedicated to climbing mountains in those areas.

I think there might be a silent majority that doesn't lean strongly in one direction or another, and feel they wouldn't add much to the conversation.

For example, I am in favor of adding wilderness protection to areas that have wilderness characteristics, are not currently used by user groups who object to the protections (MTBs and ORVs, etc), and where geography, geology, access, or use make resource exploitation prohibitive or undesirable. Areas should be excluded from wilderness protection when there is a legitimate reason. But I think the more wild we can keep wild the better.

If that convinced everyone, then we can all hold hands and sing "Kumbaya" together.

That said, I think the prohibition against human-powered transport should be changed. A mountain bike is a tool you take with you when you leave, just like a stove or tent. For most trails, they cause less erosion than currently allowed modes of transportation. As in other, non-wilderness areas, they could be permitted or prohibited on specific trails, and it should be up the local forest service to make those determinations, rather than a blanket prohibition based on a weak interpretation of an outdated law. And I don't even mountain bike.


I honestly could not have said it better myself. I feel 100% the same.

Online
User avatar
Posts: 645
Joined: 12 Dec 2006, 15:17
Location: crested butte

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby gb » 09 Oct 2011, 08:34

Yeah, roguejackalope gets it, 100%. That gives me a lot of hope looking forward.

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby ChrisRoberts » 09 Oct 2011, 18:36

Hike off trail. Problem solved.
Pass the peas--mash in the beans at a rally to gather his faculties
Read all about my schemes and adventuring at NoCo Chris Latest TR: UNs 8380A&B

Posts: 2
Joined: 31 Jul 2012, 23:33

Re: A win for the San Juans

Postby kingdavid2012 » 06 Aug 2012, 01:54

We've got a lot of environment enthusiasm in here.

But people power is far from enough.Government and legislation bureau should do their job!

Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest