Support 14ers.com
Buying gear? Please use these links to help 14ers.com:

More info...

Other ways to help...
 Peak(s):  San Luis Peak  -  14,014 feet
 Post Date:  06/14/2007
 Date Climbed:   06/10/2007
 Posted By:  cftbq

 Stewart Creek night hike   

We (trishapajean and I) had intended to catch a few hours of sleep at the TH, after the long drive over Monarch Pass and up Cotechopa Creek. But, arriving there shortly after midnight, we felt energetic enough to set off under the stars. With the moon not yet up, those stars were glorious!
We made good time to begin with, finding only a few small places where snow patches or downed timber obscured the trail. We suffered a significant delay, however, when we came to the first of the two necessary stream crossings. The water level was high enough that using stepping stones to get across was clearly out of the question. Worse, the few logs which we could see which had previously been laid across to serve as bridges were partially submerged and/or wet and/or icy. We searched both up and down the creek for probably 40 minutes before we found a place, quite a ways downstream, where a very stout tree trunk completely spanned a narrow and deep section of the streambed.
There was another delay, although not nearly as long, at the second crossing. We knew we had the right, and best, place to cross, but we had to search for a dry log to put into place to get us across.
After that, it was back to good trail and good progress, but we had to warm back up after the chill caused by our relative inactivity. The moon could be seen through the trees shortly thereafter, but we had to wait a little longer, until the actual dawn came, before we could see well enough to turn out the headlamp. On this last stretch below timberline, the trail leaves the main channel of Stewart Creek, and follows a very steep tributary on the north (or northwest) side.
We were out of the trees with the sun actually rose but, unfortunately, nowhere near the summit. We watched the growing light silhouette distant peaks of the Sangres (?), which we tried in vain to identify. We found the trail intermittently covered by patches of snow, but still easy to follow, thanks in part to large cairns. In the morning chill, the snow was firm, and we had no trouble simply walking over it, without snowshoes, crampons, or ice axes.
Once over the Organ Mtn./San Luis Pk. saddle, the view improves substantially, and it widens even more once the northwest ridge of San Luis is reached.
We were delighted to find a register, but glad we‘d brought a replacement, as it was quite full. We spent 15 or 20 minutes on the surprisingly small summit before heading down.
On the way down, we met the only other people we was on the mountain, a couple who were going up with skis. Farther down, we saw the beaver ponds which had been invisible on our way up. (We had heard a couple of tail slaps, but hadn‘t known what they were!) Also, of course, the creek crossings which had been so problematic in the night were no sweat in the morning light.
My GPS recorded a one-way distance of just over seven and a half miles, significantly more than the 5˝ shown on the TH sign. I think Roach says about six. Does anyone else have any refining data on the actual distance of this hike?



Thumbnails for uploaded photos (click to open slideshow):
 


  • Comments or Questions (4)
CODave

Nice.     2011-02-04 17:22:13
I don't have exact data but my GPS recorded 13.5 miles roundtrip, but that includes going over Baldy Alto on the descent.


BillMiddlebrook


Distance     2010-11-30 10:28:36
I hiked the standard route on San Luis yesterday and it's approximately 13 miles RT when "drifting" is removed from the GPS data. Drifting is when the GPS doesn't have a good signal so it moves around a bit, causing additional mileage (and jumpy tracking info) to be logged.


cftbq


Drifting     2010-11-30 10:28:36
Thanks, Bill! I didn't know about drifting. In fact, I had always assumed that, when the GPS loses satellite contact (which mine seems to do a lot...)it simply filled in a straight line between the points where it lost and re-gained contact. This would always result in recording less mileage than one's actual path. But this raises two other issues to me:
1) Why the heck is the unit having any trouble at all maintaining satellite contact in the open mountains, and 2)There goes my best available excuse for why we were so damned slow!


BillMiddlebrook


GPS     2010-11-30 10:28:36
I believe most GPS units don't account for drifting because it can usually be due to a poor signal instead of no signal at all. Loss of signal can happen quite often below tree line or in a bowl where it's difficult to lock onto enough satellites.



   Using your forum id/password. Not registered? Click Here


Caution: The information contained in this report may not be accurate and should not be the only resource used in preparation for your climb. Failure to have the necessary experience, physical conditioning, supplies or equipment can result in injury or death. 14ers.com and the author(s) of this report provide no warranties, either express or implied, that the information provided is accurate or reliable. By using the information provided, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless 14ers.com and the report author(s) with respect to any claims and demands against them, including any attorney fees and expenses. Please read the 14ers.com Safety and Disclaimer pages for more information.

© 2014 14ers.com®, 14ers Inc.