Page 8 of 20

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:48 am
by mattpayne11
jameseroni wrote:Just getting into this.... is it true that it's hard on the sensor in the camera if the exposure is greater than 5 minutes? Is a special filter required for longer exposure times?
First I've heard of that.

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:49 am
by Theodore
I wouldn't be surprised if it was hard on the old film SLR's, but I would bet that with 'modern' cameras, it's a non-issue.

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:33 pm
by Steve Gio
I have heard about sensors getting overloaded during long exposures. I must have read it on a photography forum but don't recall where. I would be curious to know for sure. I would think with a full format camera there should be no problem.

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:50 pm
by vonmackle
jameseroni wrote:Just getting into this.... is it true that it's hard on the sensor in the camera if the exposure is greater than 5 minutes? Is a special filter required for longer exposure times?
I think the issue with long exposures in low light photography tends to be excessive noise. I'm guessing that's why people stack several shorter exposures to create star trails.
Leaving the sensor exposed for extended periods in daylight can overheat the sensor and cause image degradation. I have experienced this when shooting in live view for too long.

I don't use any filters at night...my good lens only opens up to f4, so I need all the light I can get.

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:08 am
by mattpayne11
Yep, although sensor noise does not mean that the sensor is damaged, just that it is "hot."

I would not be concerned unless your long exposure is shooting at the sun...

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:57 pm
by mattpayne11
Thought I'd post my most recent nightscape - a 360 pano of the Milky Way and a cabin near Grand Mesa, Colorado.

Image
Milky Way and the Grand Mesa cabin by Matt-Payne, on Flickr

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:28 pm
by shaberer0511
Fantastic pictures. Matt Payne, yours are truly incredible. I am starting to take night sky pictures and I was just wondering what kind of settings/shutter speeds you use. I have taken a few but all I can see is the big dipper. Any pointers? I will try to post my picture.

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:55 am
by mattpayne11
shaberer0511 wrote:Fantastic pictures. Matt Payne, yours are truly incredible. I am starting to take night sky pictures and I was just wondering what kind of settings/shutter speeds you use. I have taken a few but all I can see is the big dipper. Any pointers? I will try to post my picture.
Thanks.

You need a tripod for starters.

You also need a decent camera and lens. The lower the f stop the better (on the lens). I use a f/2.8 lens for most my night shots... with 30 second exposures... ISO 800-3200.

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:56 am
by shaberer0511
Thanks! I will give that a shot. I have a Sony DSLR camera with two lenses ranging from 18-200 mm.

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:41 pm
by letourneau41
Would a lense with an fstop of 4 be low enough to get a decent shot? Or should I try to get to the 2.8 range.

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:39 pm
by mattpayne11
letourneau41 wrote:Would a lense with an fstop of 4 be low enough to get a decent shot? Or should I try to get to the 2.8 range.
You can do that, but ideally f 2.8

This has some great info that should get you started to help you think in terms of f and shutter speed and ISO (the exposure triangle).

http://theamusing.com/photography/startrails.html/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: night sky pictures

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 1:12 am
by ryanmicj
I shot this Sunday 8/20 from the Grays Peak trail head:

Image

f/5.6 (not sure why I wasn't using something lower...)
30 second exposure
ISO 6400

Its not the greatest, but its not bad for only my second night out. I'd love some feedback/suggestions for improvements, though.